What is the World Health Organization,
and what is it for, really? In the Children's Health Defense (CHD) video
above, Dr. Meryl Nass interviews investigative journalist James Corbett
of The Corbett Report about the weaponization of the WHO. Nass also
published a Substack with additional background information for this episode.
The WHO is actually a specialized agency within the United Nations.
It was initially established in 1948 to "further international
cooperation for improved public health conditions," but we can now see
that the long-term goal of the WHO is to serve as a foundation or hub
for a one world government under the auspice of coordinating and
ensuring global biosecurity.
This becomes self-evident when you review the proposed amendments1
to the existing International Health Regulations (IHR) and the new
pandemic treaty, which Nass and Corbett review in the featured video.
I also provided details about the treaty in "What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty." Below, I will primarily focus on the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).
Health Regulation Amendments Will Legalize Tyranny
In a December 16, 2022, Substack article,2
James Roguski also reviewed how a temporary crisis (the COVID-19
pandemic) — which, by the way, is long since over — is being used by the
WHO to seize permanent power.
Here's a quick overview of some of the most dangerous and egregious
IHR amendments they intend to implement, and what it will mean for you
and I. For additional details, see the three references listed here:3,4,5
Eliminating the concepts of respect for human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms —
The first principle in Article 3 of the original IHR states that health
regulations shall be implemented "with full respect for the dignity,
human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons."
The proposed amendment to this Article will strike "with full
respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of
persons." Now, health regulations will be based on "principles of
equity, inclusivity and coherence" only.
What does that mean? Think "You must wear a mask/social
distance/isolate/get jabbed to protect others," even if you're not sick,
or for whatever reason don't want to do any of those things.
Autonomy over your body will be eliminated. You'll have no right to
make personal health decisions. Even if you suspect you might die from
the intervention, you have to comply because it's all about what's
"best" for the collective.
Individuals won't matter. Human dignity will not be taken into
consideration. Human rights will not be taken into consideration, and
neither will the concept that human beings have fundamental freedoms
that cannot be infringed.
Another amendment is that public health measures will no longer be
aimed at achieving "the appropriate level of health protection."
Instead, the new objective will be to attain the "highest achievable
level of health protection" without any consideration of
proportionality. It's easy to see how this amendment will be used as
justification for the removal of individual rights and freedoms. |
Dictatorial powers will be given to the director-general of the WHO —
The director-general will have sole power to declare the beginning and
end of a public health emergency of international concern (PHEI), and
the sole power to dictate responses (including travel restrictions, mask
mandates, lockdowns, business closures and vaccine requirements), and
the allocation of resources to that PHEI, including funding and what
drugs are to be manufactured and used.
These dictates will override and overrule any and all national laws within member states, including the U.S. Constitution.
The obligations under the amended IHR are legally binding, and any
member nation that refuses the director-general's recommendations can be
punished through a variety of mechanisms, including economic sanctions
and embargoes. Note that the term "recommendation" is defined as
"legally binding," which means they're actually dictates, not
suggestions. |
Dictatorial powers will be given to unelected regional directors of the WHO —
Similarly, appointed (not elected) regional directors will have the
power to determine what constitutes a public health emergency of
regional concern (PHERC), and their decisions will also overrule all
other laws and Constitutional rights. |
Eliminating privacy rights — One of
the amendments (page 25) authorizes the disclosure of private and
personal data, including genomic data, "where essential for the purposes
of assessing and managing a public health risk," i.e., contact tracing
and related efforts. |
Expanding censorship — The WHO will
"strengthen capacities to … counter misinformation and disinformation"
at the global level. In other words, censorship of information will be
expanded. The WHO will dictate what "truth" is, and since its decisions
are legally binding, countries must enforce compliance. |
Mandating vaccine passports and digital IDs globally — The IHR amendments will also give the WHO the power to mandate the use of "health certificates,"6
i.e., vaccine passports. The vaccine passport, in turn, will operate as
your digital identification, which will be tied to every aspect of your
life, including your bank accounts and social credit score.
In short, it will usher in a surveillance and forced compliance system. The G20 also recently declared that digital vaccine passports standardized by the WHO will be part of international pandemic prevention and response moving forward. |
The Trail of Corruption
Ever since its founding in 1948, the WHO has been infiltrated by industry.
From Big Tobacco to the nuclear industry and pharmaceuticals, industry
has historically dictated the WHO's global agenda and continues to do so
in the present day, putting profits and power ahead of public health.7
In April 2020, then-President Donald Trump suspended U.S. funding to the WHO,8
but then directed the U.S. funding for WHO to GAVI, which is a Gates
controlled charity that likely just sent the funds to WHO. President Joe
Biden restored U.S. funding once he took office.9
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
even before Trump pulled funding was still the WHO's No.1 funder, as
Gates contributes via multiple avenues, including the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation, the vaccine alliance GAVI, the Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts (SAGE), UNICEF and Rotary International.
Gates contributes such a large portion — currently about $1 billion of the WHO's $4.84 billion biennial budget10 — that Politico in 2017 wrote a highly-critical article11 about his undue financial influence over the WHO's operations, which Politico said was causing the agency to spend:
"… a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with
the measurable outcomes Gates prefers … Some health advocates fear that
because the Gates Foundation's money comes from investments in big
business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to
undermine WHO's role in setting standards and shaping health policies."
Indeed, as noted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his book "Vax-Unvax,"12
"The sheer magnitude of his foundation's financial contributions has
made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leader of the WHO."
And, in that role, Gates is able to ensure that the decisions the WHO
makes end up profiting his own interests and those of his Big Pharma
partners.
A 'One World' Health Plan
In October 2022, the WHO announced a new initiative called One Health
Joint Plan of Action. The plan was launched by the Quadripartite, which
is made up of:
- The WHO
- The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)
- The World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH)
Beyond the amendments to the IHR, this initiative will also expand
the WHO's powers. The One Health Joint Plan of Action combines multiple
globalist organizations and synchronizes their plans, while at the same
time combining their resources and power to create a centralized global
superpower.
Decentralized health care and pandemic planning make sense, as both
medicine and government work best when individualized and locally
oriented. As it stands, however, the opposite global agenda is being
implemented.
While the Pandemic Treaty and the IHR amendments expand and
centralize power over human health with the WHO, the One Health Joint
Plan expands the WHO's power to also address "critical health threats"
to animals, plants and the environment.
When you add that together with the planned elimination of human
rights, you can see how the One Health Joint Plan can be used to enforce
climate lockdowns, for example, or travel restrictions to protect
wildlife or the environment. To learn more about this plan, see my
previous article, "WHO Assembles Superpowers With 'One Health Plan.'"
Jeremy Farrar Selected To Be WHO's Chief Scientist
December 13, 2022, the WHO announced that Sir Jeremy Farrar, head of
the Wellcome Trust, has been chosen as its new chief scientist.13 The announcement came mere days after the publication of Dr. Anthony Fauci's deposition transcript,14 which showed he and Farrar colluded to suppress discussion about SARS-CoV-2 origin.
In an op-ed for I News, columnist Ian Birrell warns that with Farrar
as chief scientist for the WHO, our chances of ever getting to the truth
about SARS-CoV-2's origin becomes vanishingly small:15
"From the start, the world was failed by the World Health
Organization. This UN body — run by a former minister in a repressive
Ethiopian regime elected with Beijing's help — praised China for
'protecting the people of the world' despite the dictatorship silencing
whistleblowers, declining to share data and delaying to warn about human
transmission …
It kowtowed to China with its ludicrous probe of the origins …
Now the body has appointed Sir Jeremy Farrar … as next chief scientist.
This is a scandalous decision given his central role in trying to
seemingly stifle suggestions that SARS-CoV-2 … might not be a natural
disease.
Science relies on openness. Yet the more that has emerged in
emails, freedom of information requests, leaks and books exposing
Farrar's actions, the less confidence we can have in him holding a
world-leading scientific role for all his undoubted expertise and
political skills …
There are two issues in the origins debate … The first is the
core question of the cause … The second issue smacks of something
darker: a bid to cover up any possibility that controversial 'gain of
function' research to boost infectivity — carried out in Wuhan, aided by
Western funding — might lie behind the pandemic …
Gradually, drip by drip, it emerged that Farrar was helping lead a
group of experts who colluded to crush suggestions the virus might be
linked to research.
Less than a fortnight after China confirmed human transmission,
the Wellcome chief hosted a teleconference at the behest of the American
presidential adviser Anthony Fauci. It included … several participants
who feared COVID might be tied to research.
Suddenly their views shifted from fearing the virus might be
manufactured to dismissing such possibilities, despite lack of fresh
data or firm evidence … [The] WHO is further undermining its credibility
by handing such an influential post to a man embroiled in allegations
of tarnishing the integrity of science on such an important quest."
The Evil Genius of Pandemic Planning
At the same time the WHO is working on its power grab, Gates and
other Great Reset allies are planning another pandemic to ensure that
transition of power takes place. As you may recall, Event 201 was a
pandemic table top exercise that "predicted" exactly what would happen
during the real-world COVID pandemic that began three months later.
October 23, 2022, Gates, Johns Hopkins and the WHO cohosted yet another exercise, this one dubbed "Catastrophic Contagion,"16,17
which involved a novel pathogen called "severe epidemic enterovirus
respiratory syndrome 2025" (SEERS-25) that primarily kills
children.
With that, we can already begin to predict what this next pandemic
will revolve around. The COVID narrative was that we must obey
irrational health rules so as not to kill grandma. The next round will
likely involve getting children vaccinated with whatever new gene-based
concoction they come up with.
Seeing how the COVID jab is now on the U.S. childhood vaccination
schedule, we can also assume that the COVID jab will be increasingly
pushed at the same time, in the name of "protecting our children."
Of course, by the time the next pandemic is declared, the IHR will
have been amended to eliminate human rights, freedoms and privacy from
consideration, and the WHO Pandemic Treaty will have been signed, both
of which grant the WHO absolute power to control pandemic declarations
and responses worldwide.
The WHO can then, through its pandemic powers, implement the next
phases of The Great Reset and Fourth Industrial Revolution, which are
rebranded terms for technocracy and the old "New World Order," melded
with the transhumanist (previously known as eugenicist) movement.
The WHO Is Tasked With Ushering in The Great Reset
As explained in "What You Need to Know About 'The Great Reset,'"
technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves
around technology — in particular artificial intelligence, digital
surveillance and Big Data collection — and the digitization of industry
and government.
This in turn allows for the automation of social engineering and
social rule, thereby doing away with the need for democratically elected
leadership. While the real plan is to usher in a tech-driven dystopia
free of democratic controls, they speak of this plan as a way to bring
us back into harmony with nature and saving the planet (i.e., the Green
agenda and Agenda 2030).
In "We Will Be Sacrificed for Global Standardization of Systems,"
I review the self-proclaimed "ruling elite's" plan to control
everything on earth, from land, water and minerals to plants, animals,
food, energy, information and human beings. This plan is known as the
Agenda for the 21st Century, or simply Agenda 21.
This roadmap for global totalitarianism was agreed to by 179 nations,
including the U.S., at the 1992 Sustainable Development conference, and
we've seen various facets of this agenda being implemented throughout
the last three years, under the cover of biosecurity and the global
COVID-19 pandemic.
Agenda 21 is based on the ideology of "communitarianism," which
argues that "an individual's rights should be balanced against rights of
the community." Community, however, in the mind of the globalists, is
made up of NGOs, corporations and government, which are to dictate what
happens around the world. The people are not really part of the
equation.
So, the communitarianist philosophy of Agenda 21 and the IHR
amendment that removes human rights and freedoms come together like two
pieces of a puzzle. The WHO's biosecurity powers can then be used to
pave the way for the more freedom-robbing aspects of Agenda 21.
Take Action to Protect Your Freedom
It's imperative that we protect our human rights and individual
freedoms, and in order to do that, we must educate our Congressional
representatives so that they understand the ramifications of going along
with the WHO. A template letter that you can use was recently published
by the Solari Report,18 copied below for your convenience.
[NAME OF AUTHOR(S)]
[ADDRESS OF AUTHOR(S)]
[EMAIL ADDRESS OF AUTHOR(S)]
[TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHOR(S)]
[Date]
Re: Your position on proposed WHO International Health Regulations
amendments, and WHO and government overreach and propaganda regarding
COVID inoculations and forced mandates.
Dear Senator/Congressman/woman _____________:
I am/we are [a] registered voter[s] within your district with grave concerns about what [I/we]
have read and heard about proposed World Health Organization (WHO)
"International Health Regulations" amendments. These amendments would
transfer control of the conduct of pandemics to the WHO. According to
leaked information on current negotiations, the amendments would, among
other things:
- Remove the word "non-binding," thereby converting the regulations from recommendations to laws;
- Remove clearly defined and understood words like "fundamental
freedoms of persons" and "dignity," instead substituting woke terms like
"equity," "diversity," and "exclusivity," thereby usurping rights
previously granted;
- Turn the WHO into a pandemic preparedness agency at the whopping
cost of $60 billion (as compared with current cost of less than $4
billion); and
- Require member nations to institute disease surveillance activities.
These International Health Regulations amendments are tantamount to a
treaty, which should require approval by Congress by a two-thirds vote.
However, it appears that proponents may be characterizing them as mere
amendments to current regulations (which would require only a majority
vote of the World Health Assembly) in order to try to circumvent the
Congressional treaty approval requirement.
Note that the U.S. never actually ratified the most recent
International Health Regulations amendments in 2005. It should go
without saying that international treaties and sovereign immunity powers
(which the WHO has) should not be permitted to override the
Constitution or the authority of our Congress.
Below is a link to a Daily Sceptic article presenting a letter
written to the U.K. Parliament by six organizations concerned with the
proposed WHO power grab. It summarizes major concerns about the treaty
as follows:
- Overreach of WHO, a nongovernmental organization;
- Conflicts of interest;
- Loss of oversight;
- Censorship;
- Loss of nationhood;
- Side-stepping of the democratic process;
- Conflation of distinct global challenges.
[I/We] believe the International Health Regulations
amendments advance the interests of a global elite in creating a
technocracy — a virtual digital concentration camp — through national
and international medical and other IDs, the "One Health" system,
central bank digital currencies, and climate-change-related "sustainable
development" and other mandates imposed by unelected technocrats.
The linked Daily Sceptic article is written in the context of the
U.K. Parliament, but the threats to personal and national sovereignty in
the U.S. are the same.
In a related development — "related" in the sense that it deals with
government propaganda and censorship regarding the so-called COVID
"pandemic" and efforts by CDC and WHO to present a false narrative to
the American people regarding the safety and effectiveness of COVID and
other proposed mRNA and other inoculations and to suppress the health
dangers of the inoculations — The Epoch Times reveals (see link below)
that the U.S. government used a secret Twitter portal to censor COVID-19
content that contradicted the government's false narrative and engaged
in similar censorship activities through Facebook, Google, and other
social media platforms.
[I/We] urge you to take action to:
- SCRUTINIZE WHO International Health Regulations
amendment negotiations before it is too late and the proposals are
"adopted" through unconstitutional means;
- OPPOSE the proposed and any similar International Health Regulations amendments;
- FORCE a Congressional vote on the proposed International Health Regulations amendments as a treaty; and
- Consistent with revelations by Sen. Ron Johnson's recent hearings on
the subject of the so-called vaccines and injuries therefrom, REIGN IN the pharma-controlled FDA and CDC in their efforts to:
(a) force vaccine and other medical mandates on the American people,
(b) engage in propaganda that falsely portrays the mRNA and other inoculations as safe and effective,
(c) interfere with the doctor-patient relationship through nefarious
schemes to silence and de-license doctors, pharmacists, and other health
care providers who disagree with the false narrative and seek
alternative, cheaper, and more effective treatments for Covid-19; and
(d) take further actions to shut down schools, businesses, and other
activities of American life under the guise of fake, pre-planned, and
engineered "pandemics" as a means of asserting government control and
ushering in a Chinese-style social credit system.
Thank you for your serious consideration of these matters of great concern to what I/we believe is a vast majority of your constituents.
Very truly yours,
[Your signature]
Related Link: "The Threat From the WHO Pandemic Treaty Should Make Our MPs Sit Up and Pay Attention," Will Jones, The Daily Sceptic (12/14/22)