Without fanfare, the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, August 11, 2022, reversed all its
COVID-19 guidelines. In fact, many have noted it appears the CDC wanted
to bring as little attention to it as possible.1
This is understandable, considering the new guidelines more or less
admit the original rules were in error, without actually stating as
much.
The new guidance is listed in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report (MMWR) under the title, "Summary of Guidance for
Minimizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual Persons, Communities,
and Health Care Systems — United States, August 2022."2 As noted by Jeffrey Tucker, founder and president of the Brownstone Institute:3
"It would have been fascinating to be a fly on the
wall in the brainstorming sessions that led to this little treatise. The
wording was chosen very carefully, not to say anything false outright,
much less admit any errors of the past, but to imply that it was only
possible to say these things now."
The CDC insists that while COVID-19 infection continues to be a
reality around the world, "high levels of vaccine- and infection-induced
immunity and the availability of effective treatments and prevention
tools have substantially reduced the risk for medically significant
COVID-19 illness ... and associated hospitalization and death."
Consequently, COVID countermeasures that create "barriers to social,
educational, and economic activity" can be ditched and everything can go
back to normal.
CDC Introduces Personal Responsibility
Considering how hard health officials have fought to segregate,
bully, demonize and dehumanize people who didn't agree with their
tyrannical and irrational COVID measures over the past 19 months, the
new guidelines are refreshing, but they're still like a slap in the
face. First and foremost, the CDC is now suddenly advocating for taking
personal responsibility — for everything:4
"Persons can use
information about the current level of COVID-19 impact on their
community to decide which prevention behaviors to use and when (at all
times or at specific times), based on their own risk for severe illness
and that of members of their household, their risk tolerance, and
setting-specific factors ...
Education and messaging to help individual persons
understand their risk for medically significant illness complements
recommendations for prevention strategies based on risk."
Individual risk assessment and risk-based countermeasures are both
something we "misinformation spreaders" have called for from the
beginning. The risk is not identical for all; hence, risk reduction
strategies should not be uniformly applied. Finally, 19 months late, the
CDC agrees.
Under the subhead, "Protecting Persons Most at Risk for Severe
Illness," the CDC now takes a page straight out of The Great Barrington
Declaration and recommends focused protection, meaning protecting those
"at particularly high risk ... because of older age, disability,
moderate or severe immunocompromise, or other underlying medical
conditions."
Need anyone be reminded that doctors and scientists have been defamed
and dragged through the mud for saying this? And Dr. Anthony Fauci,
director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
and his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins, then-director of the National
Institutes of Health, were the masterminds behind the effort to
discredit and take down the authors of the Barrington declaration.5
CDC Reneges on Discrimination
The CDC is also giving up on discrimination based on COVID jab status:6
"CDC's COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate
based on a person's vaccination status because breakthrough infections
occur ..."
They even admit that "persons who have had COVID-19 but are not
vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from
their previous infection," and therefore are not to be treated any
differently than someone who has received the COVID jab. As noted by
Tucker:7
"Remember when 40% of the members of the black
community in New York City who refused the jab were not allowed into
restaurants, bars, libraries, museums, or theaters? Now, no one wants to
talk about that.
Also, universities, colleges, the military, and so on
— which still have mandates in place — do you hear this? Everything you
have done to hate on people, dehumanize people, segregate people,
humiliate others as unclean, fire people and destroy lives, now stands
in disrepute.
Meanwhile, as of this writing, the blasted US
government still will not allow unvaccinated travelers across its
borders! Not one word of the CDC's turgid treatise was untrue back in
the Spring of 2020. There was always 'infection-induced immunity,'
though Fauci and Co. constantly pretended otherwise.
It was always a terrible idea to introduce 'barriers
to social, educational, and economic activity.' The vaccines never
promised in their authorization to stop infection and spread, even
though all official statements of the CDC claimed otherwise, repeatedly
and often."
Testing, Isolation and Contact Tracing Rules Reversed
And what about rules relating to testing, self-isolation during
illness and the whole tracking and tracing business? Out the window!
- Testing is now reserved for those who "are
symptomatic, or have a known or suspected exposure to someone with
COVID-19." Testing of asymptomatic individuals is only suggested in
"congregate settings" where medical care is limited, such as homeless
shelters and correctional facilities, and in such instances, testing
"should include all persons, irrespective of vaccination status."
- Isolation is only for those who are symptomatic and
have tested positive. Infected individuals can end their isolation
after as little as five days, if they've been fever-free for at least 24
hours without the use of fever-lowering medication, but should continue
wearing a mask or respirator when around others through day 10.
- Contact tracing is now restricted to health care settings and select "high-risk congregate settings."
Is It a Political Ploy?
While I'm glad the CDC has reversed its tyrannical COVID measures to
something sensible and more aligned with reality, the problem, as I see
it, is threefold.
First, there's the lateness of the hour. Any public health agency
worthy of such a designation would have reached these conclusions two
years ago. Instead, they spent more than two years engaged in an active
search and destroy mission against those advocating for the same
sensible guidelines the CDC is now suddenly adopting.
Secondly, the timing of these reversals smacks of political bias.
Mid-term elections are fast approaching, and the most disliked White
House administration in American history needs a "win."
With the CDC backtracking on COVID measures, they now have certain
bragging rights. "See, we brought life back to normal" — which brings us
to problem No. 3, which is that this reversal may be nothing more than a
malicious ploy to get us to let our guard down, only to be hit with
another, even more draconian fear campaign after the elections.
Biggest Vaccination Drive in History Is Coming This Fall
While that might sound paranoid, it's straight out of the handbooks
of tyranny. The way you drive people crazy is not through consistent
high-pressure tyranny, but through waves of it. The ups and downs, with
each wave being more intensely repressive than the last, create
confusion and foster fear and anxiety, which breeds an infantile kind of
reliance on authority to just fix it.
Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at New York
University, appears to agree. In an August 13, 2022, Substack article,
he writes:8
"Just as the CDC pretends to have backed off, the NHS
[the British National Health Service] reveals (to just a few) what's
really coming at us in the fall: 'The biggest vaccination drive in
history.' Those who think the worst is over better think again — because
it really won't be over til [sic] WE end it ...
[The] NHS alone is obviously not equipped, and certainly does not intend, to undertake the biggest vaccination drive in history — a drive that must, and will, be global, just
like the orchestration of the entire COVID crisis, of which this coming
drive will be the culmination (or, to quote Bill Gates, the 'final
solution').
Nor ... is it likely that this biggest vaccination drive in history will
be mounted on the now-exhausted pretext of protecting all humanity from
COVID-19 (or the flu). What's it going to be, then? Monkeypox? HIV?
COVID-20? Cancer? All of the above?
Whatever new threat(s) may be used to justify this final drive
could never be as lethal as the psychopaths who planned it, and those
entities that will not stop promoting it (even as the CDC pretends to have backed off)."
Prepare for Another Round of Gaslighting
Thacker also wonders whether the CDC's revised guidelines may be
nothing more than a political backstop to prevent Democrats from sliding
into the abyss:9
"... with a majority of Americans unhappy with the
President's pandemic policies, perhaps the CDC is relying on 'midterm
science' to guide their new appreciation for natural immunity?"
One reason for suspecting the CDC's sudden turn-about is political in
nature is the fact that it makes an absolute mess out of the carefully
scripted COVID narrative, which is supposed to be in lockstep with
governments and media around the world. As a result of the CDC trying to
give Biden's White House a "win," media and Big Tech now face a massive
conundrum.
Everything the CDC is now recommending was blasphemy punishable by
public shaming, deplatforming and delicensing, all the way up to the day
the CDC posted the new guidelines. Every COVID article and fact check
ever written is now completely off-script, as are countless public
statements made by public health officials.
There's no answer to this dilemma, so they're going to pretend it
never happened and hope no one remembers what they said all those days,
weeks or months ago. If you remind them, be prepared to be gaslighted
with denials. Thacker writes:10
"The media's forgetfulness of what they reported just
last year on vaccines and prior infection is part of the pandemic's
Great Misremembering, a collective amnesia where we march in step to
government messaging, while failing to recall prior statements and
moments of glaring contradiction.
For example, when the media reported that the NIH's
Anthony Fauci was fully vaccinated and still got COVID-19, and then they
misremembered to report his prior statement, 'When people are
vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected'
... To help everyone join the Great Misremembering, here are some
incidents you must fail to recall.
... Late in the pandemic's first year, a group of researchers released a statement called the 'John Snow Memorandum'11
that helped to shape American policy ... Among the signatories was
Rochelle Walensky, then a Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical
School, and now the Director of the CDC.
'Any pandemic management strategy relying upon
immunity from natural infections for COVID-19 is flawed,' reads the
statement signed by the current CDC Director.
Yes, the very same person who runs the CDC that now tells
us to not differentiate between vaccine and natural infection warned us
early in the pandemic that any pandemic policy that relies on natural
infection is flawed. As you read the CDC's new guidance, please remember
to misremember the memorandum previously signed by the current CDC
Director."
Which Vaccines Will Be Pushed Next?
While we don't yet know how they're going to scare the population
into getting more experimental shots — now that COVID jab uptake has
tanked and more than 112 million doses have had to be discarded for lack
of demand12,13 — we at least have an idea of what those shots are going to be.
August 15, 2022, the U.K. became the first country to approve Moderna's new bivalent COVID booster, which contains both the original concoction and mRNA to target an already out-of-date Omicron variant.14 The rest of the world will undoubtedly follow suit.
The British NHS will start rolling out the new bivalent COVID jab
September 5, 2022, starting with care home residents and other
housebound individuals.15 The wider rollout will begin September 12, just one day shy of the end of primary elections in the U.S.16
Of course, the monkeypox vaccine is also being pushed on certain groups,17 and there's the seasonal flu vaccine, so there are options when it comes to "picking your poison."
So, while the good news is that the CDC is now on the hook for having
vindicated all us "misinformation spreaders," the bad news is that
there's more insanity coming, and there's no telling exactly what form
that will take as of yet.
It looks like we'll have a short reprieve during the U.S. election
period, to put a positive spin on the Biden administration's handling of
the pandemic, and whatever the new agenda is, it'll be rolled out
afterward. We do know it'll involve "the biggest vaccine campaign in
history," though, which could get interesting, seeing how people have
woken up in droves to the fact that the COVID shots are maiming and
killing without providing any benefit.
The More COVID Shots, the Higher the Reinfection Rate
Evidence that COVID reinfection rates go up in tandem with the number
of COVID shots administered is also mounting, which is turning former
believers into skeptics. As reported by Icelander Thorsteinn Siglaugsson
in a Daily Sceptic article published in mid-August 2022:18
"Does anyone still recall the excitement in late 2020
when the vaccines against COVID-19 were finally in sight? The trial
results were excellent, promising an end to the pandemic in 2021 ... I
believed in the narrative myself ... I even took part in an attempt to
have one of the manufacturers arrange a population-wide trial in
Iceland, similar to what Pfizer did in Israel. Today I'm very glad we
didn't succeed.
Soon it will be two years since the trial results
were out ... Data on infection, hospitalization and mortality already
show vaccination not only failing to prevent those, but in some cases
being counterproductive. In short, the vaccines have failed to deliver
what we were promised.
And even worse, the skyrocketing rate of side effects
may mean that for most people vaccination makes no or little sense.
Still, it is for the most part forbidden to discuss this fact ... As an
example, it is forbidden to say COVID-19 vaccines may cause death, even
if a quick search on the internet shows confirmed cases where there is
no doubt about the causality.
It is forbidden also to share evidence showing higher
infection rates among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. It will
therefore be interesting to see how those platforms will react to those
who share the results of a new research letter published on August 3rd
in Jama Network Open.19
The letter describes the result of a study which
monitored for reinfection all Icelanders previously infected, during the
Omicron wave, between December 1st 2021 and February 22nd 2022. The
study shows a probability of reinfection of up to 15.1% among 18-29
year-olds, declining with age ...
But the most interesting part is the comparison by
vaccination status. It shows that for most age groups, those who have
received two doses or more are more likely to become reinfected than
those who have received no vaccination or one dose."
Once the broad masses begin to accept the reality that more shots
equal higher risk of COVID infection, how easy do you think it will be
for government to convince them to take a bivalent COVID jab? And if
resistance ends up being as high as I suspect it might be, come this
fall, what measures might they take to, again, try to force people into
compliance? Your guess is as good as mine.
COVID Shots Are Causing Depopulation
Another major hurdle in the plan to launch the biggest vaccination
campaign in history is the evidence showing the COVID shots are already
causing mass depopulation. As reported by The Exposé, August 7, 2022:20
"COVID-19 vaccination is causing mass depopulation.
This is an extremely bold claim to make. But unfortunately, this bold
claim is backed up by a mountain of evidence contained in the
confidential Pfizer documents and official Government data from around
the world."
Indeed, excess deaths have skyrocketed since the release of the COVID
jabs, and the timing is so exact, it can't be explained away. In the
U.K., they're now massaging data to try to hide it. As explained by The
Exposé,21 the five-year average that deaths are now compared to are made up of mortality data from 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2021.
Excess deaths started climbing in 2021, after the rollout of the
shots, and by including 2021 (rather than calculating a five-year
average from 2015 to 2019, for accurate prepandemic figures), the excess
mortality in 2022 appears closer to the five-year norm than it actually
is. Excess deaths are also up in most of Europe, as illustrated in the
graph22 below:
Eliminating confusion about the cause of these excess deaths are data
comparing the mortality rates among those jabbed and the unjabbed. July
6, 2022, the British Office for National Statistics issued a report23,24 showing the mortality rates per 100,000 are consistently lowest among the unvaccinated, in all age groups.
In the 18 to 39 age group, unvaccinated had a mortality rate of 14.1
per 100,000 during the month of May 2022, whereas those who got their
first dose at least 21 days ago had a mortality rate of 42.6 per
100,000. The mortality rate for double-jabbed was 17.3 per 100,000 and
triple-dosed had a mortality rate of 21.4 per 100,000.
As shown in the graph below, created by The Exposé,25 the identical pattern repeats for every month, January through May 2022.
Infant Mortality Has Skyrocketed
The Exposé26
also highlights data showing infant mortality is now far above the
norm. In Scotland, official data show neonatal deaths were 119% higher
in March 2022 than the annual norm. Live birth rates are also plummeting
around the world.
In Germany, the birth rate for January through April 2022 was 11%
lower than the seven-year prepandemic average. And the FDA, CDC and
Pfizer can hardly be surprised, as Pfizer's own documents show nearly
all pregnant women who participated in its trial — for whom birth
outcomes were available — lost their babies. Only one of 29 known birth
outcomes were classified as "normal." The remaining 28 miscarried.
The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database also listed
4,113 fetal deaths following COVID injection as of April 2022.27 Compare that to the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years. That number is 2,239.28
Animal research29
published in August 2021, in which female rats were given the Pfizer
jab (BNT162b2), also found it increased certain birth defects (extra
ribs) by 295% compared to controls, and doubled preimplantation loss
(i.e., fertilized ova that fail to implant). In other words, it doubled
the risk of infertility. As noted by The Exposé:30
"With this being the case, how on earth have medicine
regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance
that 'Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy'? And how have they managed to state 'It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility'?
The truth of the matter is that they actively chose
to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI)
request31 made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)."
You can read more about that in The Exposé's July 19, 2022, article,
"FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID
Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of
Birth Defects & Infertility."32
Final Thoughts
So, to wrap this up — yes, the CDC has vindicated truth tellers by
reversing its COVID guidelines and basically adopting The Great
Barrington declaration, but we're nowhere near out of the woods yet. A
major vaccination campaign is being planned for the fall, even as
evidence mounts showing the shots are causing depopulation at a rate
we've never seen before, outside of world war.
The shots are killing otherwise healthy working-age adults, they're
killing babies in the womb, and they're causing infertility. They are,
without a doubt, the most dangerous drugs ever made. So, enjoy this
reprieve, but firm up your resolve to stand against another round of
tyranny this fall.