As the COVID lies are now being exposed
at exponential speed, some of those proven wrong are getting nervous —
so nervous, in fact, they’re now pleading to just let bygones be
bygones.
The Atlantic1
has come under fire for suggesting that all the terrible pandemic-era
decisions over lockdowns, school closures, masking and punishing an
entire class of people who questioned the efficacy and wisdom of taking a
rushed, experimental vaccine — for a virus with a 99% survival rate in
most — should all be water under the bridge.
Brown University economist Emily Oster writes in The Atlantic,2
“We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were
in the dark about COVID.” Brendon Marotta in his Substack Hegemon Media3 recounts:
“I believe perpetrators call for forgiveness because
they fear punitive justice. If the perpetrators were held accountable in
our current justice system, the scale of the wrongdoing would result in
punishments the perpetrators could not bear.
These punishments would also not give those who lost
their jobs, businesses, friends, family, health, or freedom anything
back. What if there was another way that would be better for both
victims and perpetrators?
The wrongdoing of the pandemic has not been
acknowledged. Those responsible have made no apologies. Calls for
‘forgiveness’ appear dishonest when those responsible haven’t
apologized, which is usually a prerequisite to asking for forgiveness.
Creating equity would mean taking the ill-gotten
gains of perpetrators and redistributing them to the people who lost
their jobs and businesses during the pandemic. In short, it would mean
reparations. Equity is not just about money. Losses during the pandemic
were not just financial.
People lose their
friends, family, and freedoms. Much of the harm done was cultural,
emotional, and social. No amount of money can replace the ability to
grieve in person at your loved one’s funeral.”
Oster’s plea for the decency that she and the mainstream media and
public health officials failed to offer Americans during the throes of
the pandemic comes at a point when the COVID narrative has been all but
lost by the current administration and the mainstream media.
Their Lies Have Been Exposed
For nearly the last three years, I have been exposing and documenting
all of the lies that the global cabal has been promoting in their
mainstream media propaganda. As expected they have now been exposed to
be falsehoods, cluelessness and lies:
COVID jabs were never tested for, or proven to stop transmission |
The jabs were not 95% effective but actually increased the risk of getting COVID |
The fatality rate of COVID was around 0.005% |
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine worked |
Masks don’t work |
Lockdowns did more damage than good |
This bioweapon came out of a lab, and |
"Safe and effective” turned into “sudden and unexpected death” |
Their Crimes Must Be Reconciled
You weren’t allowed to say goodbye to your loved ones or attend their
funerals, but the chosen ones dined at extravagant restaurants and
allowed liquor stores and Wal-Mart to stay open. Your small business was
destroyed, while Amazon made billions.
These murderous hypocrites killed thousands of seniors by knowingly
putting infected patients into old age homes. They killed thousands more
by putting treatable patients on ventilators and Fauci’s remdesivir,
and additional thousands were killed by not allowing safe and effective
treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to be prescribed by
doctors.
They have killed and injured hundreds of thousands through coercion,
threats, mandates and a never-ending stream of lies that forced people
into taking a dangerous and untested, toxic concoction — a Big Pharma
bioweapon.
These “experts” seeking forgiveness, ostensibly because they were
just caught up in the “hysteria” of the moment, weren’t wrong. They were
lying from the outset and need to pay dearly for their crimes against
humanity.
We were scorned, ridiculed, ostracized, censored, fired, deplatformed
and wished dead by the authoritarian-minded sheep who demanded
compliance, and treated like outcasts by family members who believed the
narrative hook, line and sinker.
They pushed their agenda too far and too fast out of desperation, as
the financial underpinnings of their fake world order began to strain
and crumble. This desperation exposed their blatant lies to a vast array
of critical thinkers across the world who have not been deterred in
exposing the falsehoods on social media, blogs and free-speech websites.
Why We Must Reject Amnesty Plea
The reasons we must reject Oster’s amnesty plea are manifold. First
and foremost, while some now want to argue ignorance as their defense,
there was no lack of facts and data, right from the start, proving their
positions were wrong, dangerous, destructive and deadly.
Since data were readily available, the real question they need to ask
themselves is: “Why did I believe all the lies and propaganda?”
Self-reflection is needed here. Related to this is Oster’s ridiculous
claim that “getting something right had a hefty element of luck.”
Absolutely not. Give me one example where luck played a role.
People who got it right did so because they exercised their critical
thinking skills and a) read the data, b) correctly analyzed that data
and c) drew rational conclusions based on that analysis. Analysis and
reason are not reliant on luck.
No luck was needed to know that masks were useless. The published
science told us as much. Ditto for the conclusion that natural immunity
is superior to vaccine-induced immunity. No luck was needed to know
there was no such thing as asymptomatic spreaders, because again,
science. Not only can you not have a “hot” infection without symptoms,
but research looking at millions of individuals confirmed what we
already knew from basic virology.
No luck was needed to correctly predict that lockdowns would have a
dramatically negative effect on health, education and the economy. That
was just plain rational, but early cost-benefit analyses also confirmed
it.
No luck was needed to know that the COVID jab was useless because
data from around the world rapidly grew to show that case rates rose in
tandem with the shots. Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden and CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky have also demonstrated this.
All were jabbed more than once, and all got COVID — more than once! Seventy percent of jabbed CDC employees also got COVID,
and on several occasions, ships where 100% of crew and passengers were
jabbed reported outbreaks. None of this would occur if the shots
actually prevented infection and spread, and you need no special skills
other than clear-headed reason to come to that conclusion.
You also don’t need special skills to see that the COVID shots are
killing healthy people. Just look at all the sudden deaths of
professional athletes and children. It’s so common they’ve even given it
a new name: Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. Look at the excess mortality statistics and the skyrocketing life insurance claims.
Oster’s proposition that luck was behind correct analyses is a
cop-out and a sign that she’s not ready to accept that she was gullible
and irrational — and possibly cruel toward others. Recall, threatening
the lives of the unvaccinated and mocking their deaths was basically
part of the public policy.4
Forgiving the ignorant because they don’t know what they’re doing may
be the spiritual imperative, but social etiquette demands that if you
WANT someone to forgive you, you FIRST apologize and THEN ask for
forgiveness. What’s missing from Oster’s call to forgive her and
everyone else who’s been proven wrong is an apology.
Government Officials Must Be Held Accountable
This is even more important when it comes to media and our health and
government officials. Granting amnesty to individuals who have been
wrong from Day 1, without a single apology, is an untenable proposition.
The price society has paid for their errors is far too great for that.
They may ask for forgiveness, and they may be forgiven by many, but
they STILL must be held accountable for their errors. Demanding that
officials be held accountable for errors is not gloating. It’s
reestablishing a baseline of conduct and accountability to the public —
something we seem to have lost.
Their reckless behavior has caused people to lose their businesses,
their livelihoods; they’ve lost family members to reckless medicine;
they’ve lost out on weddings and funerals; drug use and suicides have
skyrocketed; children have fallen years behind on their schooling and
the economy has been destroyed. The list goes on. Being wrong has a
price, and society will be paying it for quite some time.
What’s more, our health and government officials weren’t just wrong
once and then changed course. No, they’ve doubled, tripled and
quadrupled down on errors, even in the face of overwhelming evidence
that they’re wrong, and we’re just supposed to “let bygones be bygones”?
Not a chance.
First, we have to set the record straight, so everyone actually knows
what the truth is, and then we have to make sure these kinds of errors
cannot be committed again. A truce is a distant third on the list of how
to move forward.
Those Proven Right Are Still Persecuted
Setting the record straight starts with ending the persecution of
those proven to be right. It also requires putting an end to censorship
and the promulgation of propaganda.
With regard to the propaganda, this will require rewriting the law.
The use of state propaganda against the American public was illegal
until 2012, when then-president Obama legalized it through an amendment
to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).5
That amendment must be repealed so that media can again be held
accountable for the illegal dissemination of government propaganda.
Moving forward, we also likely need to either abolish or radically
reassess the role of medical boards. As it stands, medical boards have
been weaponized to silence doctors who go against the state propaganda
and tell the truth about COVID.
The latest victim of this government orchestrated persecution is Dr.
Peter McCullough, one of the most well-credentialed and respected
cardiologists in the world. He’s now being stripped of his medical
credentials for the crime of speaking truth to the public (and thereby
contradicting the legalized propaganda).6
He’s also been terminated from his position as editor-in-chief of
Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (RCM) — all
without due process. RCM was even so cowardly to publicly claim he
“stepped down” as his term of office had ended. As noted by McCullough,
there are “powerful dark forces” at work in academic medicine “to
expunge any resistance” to the COVID jab.
Editor Forced to Resign Over McCullough’s COVID Paper
Anyone who dares publish McCullough’s research also skates on thin
ice. Dr. Jose Luis Domingo, editor-in-chief of the science journal Food
and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) for the past seven years, was recently
forced to resign for that very reason. As reported by the Epoch Times:7
“Though Domingo has himself received three
vaccinations (two AstraZeneca and one Pfizer), he told The Epoch Times
that he has been bombarded with insults, threats, and accusations of
being ‘anti-vaccine’ ever since he approved the publication of a
scientific paper8
[by McCullough, Stephanie Seneff, Greg Nigh and Anthony Kyriakopoulos]
that explores potential mechanisms of harm of injected synthetic mRNA
...
This research was co-authored by a team of preeminent
scientists, including Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research
scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dr. Peter
McCullough, an internationally known cardiologist who has published over
a hundred peer-reviewed articles during his 40-year career; and Dr.
Anthony Kyriakopoulos, a Greek clinical microbiologist, medical doctor,
and researcher who has a Ph.D. in medical and molecular microbiology.
Their research proposed that alterations in the
vaccine mRNA may ‘hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a
longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein.’ In
doing so, these scientists posited, mRNA vaccines may interfere with the
body’s natural immune response.
They described this interference as ‘profound
impairment,’ which, they believe, comes about specifically because the
spike protein interferes with a critical early innate immune response
mechanism, called the type I interferon response.
If they are correct, injected synthetic mRNA will
have a variety of negative consequences on human health, including
making our bodies less able to control infections and suppress cancer
...
About a month after the paper was published, Domingo
said, he began receiving angry emails and messages. These included
insults, calls to resign, demands to retract the paper, and even threats
... The angry messages, he said, were filled with ad hominem attacks
against him and against the paper’s co-authors, but did not specify
their scientific objections to the contents of the paper ...
Though he would have preferred to stay at the helm of
the journal until the end of 2023 ... Domingo has issued his
resignation from the journal to maintain his scientific independence.
He told us he is first and foremost a scientist, and
that he does not regret publishing the paper. Despite the attacks, he
was not willing to give in to the pressure from the journal’s publisher
... Jagna Mirska ...
Domingo said that the journal has already picked a
successor for his position — someone with clear ties to the
pharmaceutical industry: Bryan Delaney, Ph.D. According to his LinkedIn
page, Delaney is a toxicologist who currently works for Haleon. Haleon
is pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKlein’s new brand name for its
consumer health unit.”
What Else Have They Been Wrong About?
The list of so-called “errors” is a long one. They were wrong about
masks working and natural immunity not working, they were wrong about
asymptomatic spread, lockdowns and the safety and effectiveness of the
COVID shots. They were also wrong about SARS-CoV-2 jumping naturally
from bats to humans by way of a wet market in Wuhan, China.
Not even a month has passed since we witnessed the stunning
revelation that Pfizer never tested its COVID shots for transmissibility
before proclaiming publicly that the vaccine protected against
transmission. Then they had the CDC put the bioweapon on the childhood
vaccine schedule and the same day increased the price of their jab by
400%.
As reported by Rising host Robby Soave (video above) and Vanity Fair,9
a report by the Minority Oversight Staff of the Senate Committee on
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, released in October 2022,
concluded that “a research-related incident is the most likely
explanation for COVID-19.”
The COVID jab tyrants were also wrong when they insisted that
mandating an experimental gene therapy was within legal bounds. Such
mandates have since been overturned in a number of districts. Most
recently, a New York judge ruled that New York City’s COVID jab mandate
for municipal workers was enacted illegally and any employee fired for
noncompliance must be immediately reinstated — and receive back pay.10
According to Supreme Court Justice Ralph Porzio, the Health
Commission’s jab mandate “violates the separation of powers doctrine”
enshrined in the state constitution, as well as workers’ due process
rights. In his ruling, Porzio noted:
“The vaccination mandate for City employees was not
just about safety and public health; it was about compliance. If it was
about safety and public health, unvaccinated workers would have been
placed on leave the moment the order was issued. If it was about safety
and public health, the Health Commissioner would have issued city-wide
mandates for all residents.”
The New York City law department immediately filed an appeal, which
blocked the reinstatement of the workers. Time will tell, but I suspect
that in the end, the city will just end up having to pay out even more
in back pay.
US Government Still Plans to Police Wrong-Think
As mentioned earlier, amnesty for COVID dictators is impossible in
light of continued censorship, and there’s no sign of that ending any
time soon. On the contrary, leaked documents show the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) has every intention of policing wrong-think.
Biden’s “Ministry of Truth”
may have been disbanded in the wake of public mockery, but the plan for
such an entity was not shelved. As reported by The Intercept:11
“Years of internal DHS memos, emails, and documents —
obtained via leaks and an ongoing lawsuit, as well as public documents —
illustrate an expansive effort by the agency to influence tech
platforms ...
Behind closed doors, and through pressure on private
platforms, the U.S. government has used its power to try to shape online
discourse.
According to meeting minutes and other records
appended to a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, a
Republican who is also running for Senate, discussions have ranged from
the scale and scope of government intervention in online discourse to
the mechanics of streamlining takedown requests for false or
intentionally misleading information ...
In a March meeting, Laura Dehmlow, an FBI official,
warned that the threat of subversive information on social media could
undermine support for the U.S. government ...
There is also a formalized process for government
officials to directly flag content on Facebook or Instagram and request
that it be throttled or suppressed through a special Facebook portal
that requires a government or law enforcement email to use. At the time
of writing, the ‘content request system’ at
facebook.com/xtakedowns/login is still live ...
According to a draft copy of DHS’s Quadrennial
Homeland Security Review, DHS’s capstone report outlining the
department’s strategy and priorities in the coming years, the department
plans to target ‘inaccurate information’ on a wide range of topics,
including ‘the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of
COVID-19 vaccines, racial justice, U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and
the nature of U.S. support to Ukraine.’”
As you can see, censorship is not restricted to COVID issues alone.
They include a variety of national politics and geopolitical issues as
well. In other words, Americans’ views of the world and our country are
being shaped by a propaganda arm of the U.S. government itself — not
another country — and the reason they have no qualms about doing this is
because Obama legalized the use of government propaganda against
Americans during his presidency.
Censorship Is Now a Core Duty of the DHS
In addition to abolishing or radically reforming medical boards, the
FDA and CDC, we probably need to do the same to the DHS. As reported by
The Intercept, documentation shows the “DHS views the issue of tackling
disinformation and misinformation as a growing portion of its core
duties.”
I don’t know about you, but when I think about what Homeland Security
should be doing, policing and punishing my personal views about health,
medicine, climate change, political actors and geopolitical actions is
not at the top of the list. Yet that’s precisely what they’re doing, and
will be doing more of in the years to come.
To control the information space, the DHS intends to “leverage
advanced data analytics technology” and work with nongovernmental
agencies and other civil society organizations “to build resilience to
the impacts of false information.”
Government Censorship by Surrogate Is Still Illegal
For now, Schmitt is combating this tyrannical and unconstitutional overreach in court. As reported by The Intercept:12
“In May, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt took
the lead in filing a lawsuit to combat what he views as sweeping efforts
by the Biden administration to pressure social media companies to
moderate certain forms of content appearing on their platforms.
The suit alleges governmentwide efforts to censor
certain stories, especially ones related to the pandemic. It also names
multiple agencies across the government that have participated in
efforts to monitor speech and ‘open collusion’ between the
administration and social media companies ...
October 21, the judge presiding over the case granted
the attorneys general permission to depose Fauci, CISA officials, and
communication specialists from the White House.
While the lawsuit has a definite partisan slant,
pointing the finger at the Biden administration for allegedly seeking to
control private speech, many of the subpoenas request information that
spans into the Trump era and provides a window into the absurdity of the
ongoing effort.
‘There is growing evidence that the legislative and
executive branch officials are using social media companies to engage in
censorship by surrogate,’ said Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at
George Washington University, who has written about the lawsuit.
‘It is axiomatic that the government cannot do
indirectly what it is prohibited from doing directly. If government
officials are directing or facilitating such censorship, it raises
serious First Amendment questions.’”
No Chance of Amnesty for US Leadership
To bring us back to where we started, with Oster’s plea for amnesty
for those who ignorantly chose to be on the wrong side of history, I am
not alone in my view that her proposition is an unworkable one.
Sure, on a personal level, many are likely willing and able to bury
the hatchet and join hands again with friends and family who shunned and
berated them as “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-science anti-vaxxers”
(although following the science and the data was precisely what we were
all doing).
But on the leadership level, amnesty is out of the question. Leaders
must be held accountable for decisions based on lies. They must be held
accountable for their fraud and deception.
Agency heads must be held accountable for their data manipulation and
obfuscation, Big Tech leadership must be held accountable for their
efforts to aid government in the circumvention of our Constitutional
rights, and mainstream media, including individual hosts and reporters,
must be held to account for their propaganda role, which has injured and
killed hundreds of thousands of Americans who trusted them.
A court recently ruled Alex Jones must pay nearly $1 billion in
damages to families for falsely claiming that no children died in the
2012 Sandy Hook shooting,13 an event that many in alt media suspected was a false flag operation at the time. Now, that fine is quite a precedent.
What would be the appropriate fine for journalists who claim no one
has died from the COVID shot? Or that COVID jab injuries are
“exceedingly rare”? What would be the appropriate fine for tech
platforms that censor the personal testimonies of the injured and
families of the dead, thereby perpetuating the lie that injuries and
deaths don’t occur?
What would be an appropriate payout by federal agencies that
falsified data to hide adverse effects and deaths? If you guessed in the
trillions you would have profoundly underestimated the damage they have
done.
No Chance of Amnesty for Enforcers of False COVID Narrative
The American Conservative had this to say about the “Soviet blue-check media” in the United States:14
“There can be no amnesty for the unthinking enforcers
of the narrative of the regime. I don’t know how to put this gently to
my fellow members of the blue-check media class, so I will say it
bluntly. You guys resemble nothing so much as the info apparatus of some
failing ideological state — late-Soviet apparatchiks, only without the
erudition that was demanded of regime intellectuals in Moscow back in
the day ...
In February 2020, the Washington Post published a news story with the headline: ‘Tom Cotton Keeps Repeating a Coronavirus Conspiracy Theory That Scientists Have Debunked.’
More than a year later ... the paper ‘rewrote the
article’s headline, softening ‘conspiracy theory’ to ‘fringe theory’ and
noting that scientists have ‘disputed’ it rather than ‘debunked’ it.’
How generous. How scrupulous ...
If the lab-leak theory were a rare instance in which
blue-check media abdicated basic journalistic responsibility in favor of
elite narrative enforcement, one could forgive and forget, as the
Atlantic now demands.
But such lapses are utterly commonplace — systemic,
you might say. Remember when Big Tech and Big Media and Big Intelligence
teamed up to frame the New York Post’s Hunter Biden reporting in
October 2020 as ‘misinformation’ — only to concede, once the election
was safely over, that it was, in fact, entirely accurate?
Remember the absolute unanimity with which blue-check
media defended the efficacy of COVID vaccines in stopping transmission —
before begrudgingly admitting that, erm, actually, they really don’t
work as advertised?
Remember when blue-check media were dead-certain that
Jussie Smollett was the victim of a racist attack? And on and on and
on. Once the falsity of the old narrative is definitively established,
most blue-checks shamelessly move on to the next elite narrative in need
of media reinforcement — no apology, no introspection.
The few willing to acknowledge their errors,
meanwhile, insist they were merely following the ‘expert’ consensus at
the time. This is risible. The job of the reporter isn’t to parrot what
the experts say at any given moment: it is to question what anyone in
power claims.
‘If your mother tells you she loves you, check it
out,’ used to be the journalistic motto. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Pfizer, WHO,
and 50 former intelligence officials deserve far more exacting scrutiny
than Mom.”
Rhetorical Constructs of Manipulative Language
Another rebuttal to Oster’s call for amnesty that I want to highlight
is from the anonymous Substack writer known only as “A Midwestern
Doctor,” who dissects the “manipulative language” used by Oster in her
article. The anonymous doctor writes:15
“When I read through this article, I realize the
author highlighted a very common problem ... The author is demanding to
receive forgiveness for their conduct, but ... is refusing to admit they
did anything wrong.
In order to accomplish this, they utilized a variety
of manipulative rhetorical constructs that are relatively simple and
frequently utilized. Because it is so common to encounter propaganda
pieces like this, I thought there might be some value in illustrating my
thought process as I read this article.”
The doctor goes on to share screenshots of Oster’s article, with
arrows to sentences and thoughts inserted in red. Below are a few of
those screenshots. For the rest, please see the original Substack
article.16
Take Control of Your Wealth
Financial collapse is an inevitable outcome of the COVID plandemic.
In the video above, finance guru Catherine Austin Fitts and attorney
Carolyn Betts review the tools you need to take control of your
finances at this critical time in history. We must reclaim our
independence from the central banks and denounce their planned digital
currency, as both are part of a massive control and slave system.