Cyberwar is currently taking place on
several levels. On the international level, China and Russia in
particular have become known for their hacking skills. As reported by
“Full Measure,”1 corporate cybercrime around the world is now costing $940 billion each year, and that cost is only going up.
Russian hackers tend to focus on the financial gains of ransomware,
the attack on the Colonial Pipeline in 2021 being one notable example.2
China, meanwhile, tends to pursue American trade secrets. One example
given is the cyber theft of the engineering plans for the American F-35
fighter jet.
According to the “Full Measure” report (video above), the U.S.
government estimates between $200 billion and $600 billion in trade
secrets and intellectual property has been stolen every year for the
last two decades. The end game of all this cyberwarfare is “to rule the
world,” James Lewis, a cyber security expert with the Center for
International and Strategic Studies, told “Full Measure.”
China, he says, has been selected to be the dominant power in the
world, and “They believe China should be setting the rules
internationally.” Lewis doesn’t specify who “they” are, but most likely
he’s referring to the self-described “elites” that work for and/or with
the World Economic Forum to bring about The Great Reset.
They, indeed, have their sights on replicating the Chinese
surveillance and control system worldwide, but whether they’ll actually
allow the Chinese to rule their New World Order is up for debate.
Destroying Dissenters Through Cyberwarfare
So, generally speaking, cyberattacks
and hacking have become a primary business. There’s big money in it,
whether we’re talking about the theft of intellectual property or
holding critical information hostage for ransom.
But cyberattacks are not just a financial enterprise. Cyberwarfare is
also used to destroy dissenters, and most of those attacks are
conducted on a national level — meaning, governments are using
cyberwarfare techniques on their own citizens.
When hackers destroyed my website and email servers, they clearly had
no intention of making money off of it. They wanted to destroy our
infrastructure, and they were successful. Who would want to do that? The
Russians? The Chinese? Probably not. No, the culprits are far more
likely to originate within U.S. borders.
We now know that Big Tech has been pressured by the global Great
Reset cabal to censor people, around the world, who reveal their agenda
and speak out against their plans. In the U.S., Big Tech has also been illegally pressured to violate free-speech rights by a large number of U.S. government officials, including President Biden personally.
The intent behind it is the same. The U.S. government is pursuing The
Great Reset agenda and that includes keeping the COVID plandemic alive
and getting as many as possible to submit to voluntary “vaccassination.”
Facebook and Twitter both have special portals3
that government officials use to censor content. Whatever government
disagrees with vanishes from the platforms, no questions asked.
Academics funded by the likes of Bill Gates have also published
globalist propaganda calling for cyberterrorism experts to go on the
counteroffensive to snuff out antivaxxers, the so-called “disinformation
dozen” in particular. As it happens, I am at the top of that list, and
as it happens, my website was targeted and destroyed by sophisticated
hackers. Coincidence? I think not.
It’s quite clear that those behind this attack were not in it for the
money. They wanted to silence me by putting me out of business.
Fortunately, they did not succeed in that overarching goal. My articles
are still being published through Substack, and we were able to get our online market back up which pays the bills for this newsletter and staff in only a few days.
But the message is clear. Censoring us is not enough. They want to
destroy us — and not just me but all of us. The list of organizations
that have had their websites erased or destroyed by hackers is a long
one at this point, and they all have one thing in common. They seek to
educate people about what’s really going on, in particular the truth
about the COVID shots, which are neither safe nor effective.
Equally long, if not longer, is the list of individuals and
organizations who have been debanked and had their online payment
accounts shut down for the “crime” of sharing information that doesn’t
fit the globalist narrative. All of these tactics are tactics used in
modern war, and now they’re being used against us.
Public Call for Cyberterrorism Against US Citizens
One of the most aggressive promoters of illegal cyberwarfare against U.S. citizens is Gates-funded pediatrician Dr. Peter Hotez,4 dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
He’s also the co-director of the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine
Development and, ironically, a health policy scholar in the Baylor
Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, despite having no intention
of applying medical ethics whatsoever.
Twice the formerly prestigious science journal Nature has published
articles by Hotez in which he calls for the use of cyberwarfare assaults
on American citizens who disagree with official COVID narratives.
The first came out in April 2021.5
In that article, Hotez argued that stopping the spread of COVID “will
require a high-level counteroffensive” against “destructive forces,”
meaning those sharing information about the dangers and absolute
uselessness of the COVID shots.
Of course, propaganda wouldn’t be propaganda without certain key
slurs, so people concerned about vaccine safety are described as
“far-right extremists” and “conspiracy theorists” fueled by Russian
misinformation.
“Accurate, targeted counter-messaging from the global
health community is important but insufficient, as is public pressure
on social-media companies. The United Nations and the highest levels of
governments must take direct, even confrontational, approaches with
Russia, and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States,” Hotez wrote.6
“Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber
security, law enforcement, public education and international relations.
A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN
secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine
aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures.
The task force should include experts who have
tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and
nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels
of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization
requires a counteroffensive.”
Nature Publishes Second Hotez Threat
Today, more than a year later, many of Hotez’ arguments for the COVID
jab are moot. Pfizer itself has even admitted they never tested the
shot to see if it actually prevented infection and spread. We also have
clear data showing it does not, in fact, prevent spread, and therefore
cannot end the pandemic no matter how many people get the jab or how
many doses they take.
Hotez, however, is doubling down. In a November 2, 2022, Nature article,7
he argues that “SARS-CoV-2 variants offer a second chance to fix
vaccine inequities” and “combat rising anti-vaccine aggression.”
Ironically, Hotez was out of step with reality even as his article was
being published.
“The failures to both fully vaccinate and boost could create a dire
situation in 2023 as the Omicron subvariants continue mutating ... with
unprecedented growth and immune escape advantages,” Hotez wrote, paying
no attention to the fact that even people with five doses are still
getting sick with COVID.
Gauging by the case of Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control, the fifth dose may offer only four weeks of
protection. Clearly, more doses are not the answer. If five doses can’t
protect you for more than a month, why continue?
Hotez doesn’t address any of these realities, however, and instead
doubles down on aggressively eliminating those who contribute to the
growing “vaccine hesitancy.”
“The anti-vaccine movement has evolved into a deliberate, organized and well-financed destructive force,” he writes in his latest article. “It
kills more people than global terrorism, nuclear proliferation and
cyberattacks combined. Yet, we do not treat it as such ...
Promoting local vaccine production of the Omicron
boosters while countering the anti-vaccine activism ... represent the
new twin pillars of global vaccine equity. Urgent action to address both
forces will help to correct the past mistakes ...”
Part of the “countering anti-vaccine activism” that Hotez is
repeatedly calling for is cyberterrorist attacks on websites such as
Mercola.com. So, who, exactly, is the terrorist here? The one handing
out free information to whomever wants it, or the one calling for armed
aggression and cyberattacks against civilians exercising their free
speech rights?
Hotez Implicated in COVID Engineering
Earlier this fall we discovered Hotez may actually have more personal
reasons for asking government goons to attack those who punch holes in
the cabal’s narrative.
Not only is he an irrational defender of the already-proven
ineffective and dangerous COVID shots, he’s also tried to dismiss the
lab leak theory as “an outlandish conspiracy theory,” and called for an
end to the Congressional probe into gain-of-function research, decrying
it as a “threat to American biomedical science.”8
Hotez’s dismissal of the lab escape theory is particularly ironic considering he received a $6.1 million grant9
from the National Institutes of Health in 2012 for the development of a
SARS vaccine in case of an “accidental release from a laboratory,”
“deliberate spreading of the virus by a terrorist attack,” or a zoonotic
spillover event.
The research under that grant took place from 2012 until 2017. After
spending five years preparing for the possibility of an accidental or
deliberate release of SARS, why would Hotez think a lab leak of
SARS-CoV-2 was out of the question? Clearly, Hotez is no stranger to the
possibility of lab leaks.
Well, in early August 2022, U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) discovered a
potential reason for why Hotez was so adamant about COVID being
all-natural and why he’s so opposed to Congress looking into potential
improprieties involving gain-of-function research.10
As it turns out, Hotez funded gain-of-function research11
to create a chimeric SARS-related coronavirus — the very research now
being scrutinized by Congress, in part because it may help explain where
SARS-CoV-2 came from, and in part because it appears this research
should have been subject to gain-of-function review procedures but
wasn’t.
So, could it be that Hotez’s dismissals of the lab leak theory and
the Congressional inquiry are based in fear that he may be implicated in
the creation of the COVID pandemic?
At bare minimum, he’s got conflicts of interest that can color his
opinions on these matters. His conflicts of interest are all the more
pertinent when you consider he’s on The Lancet COVID-19 Commission,
where he co-chairs the COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics task force.12
An Open War on the Public
We’re now in a situation where asking valid questions about public
health measures are equated to acts of domestic terrorism. It’s
unbelievable, yet here we are.
Over the past three years, the rhetoric used against those who
question the sanity of using unscientific pandemic countermeasures, such
as face masks and lockdowns, or share data showing that COVID-19 gene
therapies are really bad public health policy.
It has become increasingly violent, and in classic Orwellian
Doublespeak, those who claim to defend science and democracy are
actually undermining both, and blatantly so. Similarly, those who claim
to combat hate speech and terrorism actually foster and create it.
However, in the end, lies cannot stand up to the truth, which is
precisely why deep state organizations such as the International Grand
Committee on Disinformation13 (IGCD) and the Centers for Countering Digital Hate14 (CCDH) are working overtime to harmonize laws across the democratic world to censor and eliminate all counternarratives — and to employ more aggressive warfare tactics when that doesn’t work.
Currently, it’s primarily about silencing questions and inconvenient
truths about all things relating to COVID, but in the future, such laws
will allow them to silence discussion on any topic that threatens
undemocratic rule by globalists.
Protecting Free Speech Is Paramount
Make no mistake, the globalist cabal intends to control everyone on
the planet, and those they cannot control, they will seek to either
destroy or kill. It’s open war on the public, and without freedom of
speech, we lose one of our most effective means of defense.
To avoid such a fate, we must be relentless in our pursuit of sharing
truth, and we must demand that our elected representatives stand up for
freedom of speech and other Constitutional rights.
We also need to repeal the amendment to the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) that legalized the U.S. government’s use of
propaganda against its own citizens.15
The use of state propaganda against the American public was illegal
until 2012, when then-president Obama amended the NDAA to legalize it.
I believe this is a major reason why no shred of truth comes out of
the mainstream media anymore. They’re all following a prescribed
propaganda narrative, and no amount of evidence to the contrary
influences them.