According to Kaiser Health News (KHN),1
the COVID-19 pandemic has been a real boon to Pfizer. Not only has it
yielded “outsize benefits” in terms of profits, but it has also “given
the drugmaker unusual weight in determining U.S. health policy.”
“Based on internal research, the company’s executives
have frequently announced the next stage in the fight against the
pandemic before government officials have had time to study the issue,
annoying many experts in the medical field and leaving some patients
unsure whom to trust,” KHN reporter Arthur Allen writes, adding:2
“When last year Bourla suggested that a booster shot
would soon be needed, U.S. public health officials later followed,
giving the impression that Pfizer was calling the tune.
Some public health experts and scientists worry these
decisions were hasty, noting, for example, that although boosters with
the mRNA shots produced by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech improve antibody
protection initially, it generally doesn’t last.
Since January, Bourla has been saying that U.S.
adults will probably all need annual booster shots, and senior FDA
officials have indicated since April that they agree ... The company’s
power worries some vaccinologists, who see its growing influence in a
realm of medical decision-making traditionally led by independent
experts ...
When President Biden in September 2021 offered
boosters to Americans — not long after [Pfizer CEO Albert] Bourla had
recommended them — Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education
Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ... wondered, ‘Where’s the
evidence you are at risk of serious disease when confronted with COVID
if you are vaccinated and under 50?’
Policies on booster
recommendations for different groups are complex and shifting, Offit
said, but the CDC, rather than Bourla and Pfizer, should be making them.
‘We’re being pushed along,’ he said. ‘The pharmaceutical companies are
acting like public health agencies.’”
The fact that a vaccine-pusher like Offit — infamous for claiming a baby can safely tolerate 10,000 vaccines at once3
— is questioning and pushing back against Pfizer’s influence over
health policy reveals just how brazen, unethical and potentially
dangerous that is.
Massive Profits Made From Useless Products
According to Allen, Pfizer’s revenue in 2021 was $81.3 billion4 — approximately double that of 2020 — and the COVID shot accounted for $36.78 billion5 of that. For comparison, Lipitor, Pfizer’s previous top selling statin, generates roughly $2 billion a year,6 while their strep vaccine, Prevnar 13 rakes in $6 billion a year.7
Its mRNA gene transfer injection against COVID now dominates 70% of
the U.S. and European markets, and Paxlovid, Pfizer’s COVID drug, has
become a standard treatment choice in hospitals. This, despite
researchers finding Paxlovid (molnupiravir) causes severe rebound and supercharges mutations.
In a rational scenario, that finding would have put a stop to its use, but no. In an official health advisory8
to the public, issued May 24, 2022, the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention first warns that Paxlovid is associated with
“recurrence of COVID-19 or ‘COVID-19 rebound,’” and then in the very
next sentence stresses in bold print a narrative supporting its use and
enriching Pfizer with instructions saying:
“Paxlovid continues to be recommended for early-
stage treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 among persons at high risk
for progression to severe disease.”
Allen also notes that, during an investor call, a Pfizer official
highlighted reports of Paxlovid’s failure, but spun it into “good news”
for investors, as patients may require multiple courses!9 Obviously the objective has long ago shifted from helping humans to raping them for as much profit as possible.
Similarly, while Pfizer’s COVID jab clearly doesn’t prevent infection
or spread, and Americans are rejecting the shots in growing numbers —
82.2 million doses had expired and were chucked in the trash as of
mid-May 202210 — the U.S. government still went ahead and ordered another 105 million doses at the end of June 2022.
These are intended for a fall booster campaign, at a cost to taxpayers of $3.2 billion.11
The U.S. is actually paying about 50% more for each of these new jab
boosters this time around — $30.47 per dose compared to $19.50 per dose
paid for the first 100 million doses.
The U.S. government has also promised to purchase another 20 million
courses of Paxlovid, at an eye-watering cost of $530 per five-day
course. Basically, Pfizer is being financially rewarded for producing
products that are useless at best and dangerous at worst, and we’re all
paying for it. In case you’re curious, that is another $10.6 billion
transferred from U.S. taxpayers to Pfizer.
Future Boosters Won’t Undergo Human Clinical Trials
After you likely thought it couldn’t ever get any worse, KHN also
touches on, but doesn’t delve into, the fact that Pfizer suggested they
skip human trials as they move forward with jabs that are reformulated
for newer variants. If this strikes you as crazy, you’d be right. It’s
sheer madness, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — a clearly
captured agency — has already surreptitiously agreed to this egregious
miscarriage of science.
How this wicked scheme, known as the “Future Framework,”12
was adopted by the FDA without formal vote is explained by Toby Rogers,
Ph.D. — a political economist whose research focus is on regulatory
capture and Big Pharma corruption13 — in the video above. He also explained it in a June 29, 2022, Substack article:14
“Yesterday [June 28], the FDA’s Vaccines and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee approved a bivalent COVID-19 shot
with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant ... Wait, hold up, I
thought the FDA was voting on the Future Framework yesterday?
The policy question was whether reformulated COVID-19
shots would be treated as new molecular entities (which they are) in
which case they should be subject to formal review or whether
reformulated shots would be treated as ‘biologically similar’ to
existing Covid-19 shots and be allowed to skip clinical trials
altogether.
Apparently the FDA did not have the votes to just
pass this as a policy question. If you ask anyone whether reformulated
mRNA represents a new molecular entity, well of course it is, so that
would require formal regulatory review.
What the FDA did instead was to smuggle the policy question in disguised as a vote about reformulated ‘boosters’ for the fall.
In essence, the FDA just started doing the Future
Framework (picking variants willy nilly, skipping clinical trials) and
essentially dared the committee members to turn down a booster dose —
knowing that all of the VRBPAC members are hand-picked because they’ve
never met a vaccine they did not like.
So of course only two people on the committee had the
courage to turn down a booster dose — even though it was based on this
preposterous process (that was never formally adopted) where there was
literally no data at all ... By stealth, the FDA replaced a system based
on evidence with a system based entirely on belief.”
Countries Held to Ransom
In 2021, secret details of Pfizer’s contracts came to light, showing
they are essentially holding countries hostage to nonnegotiable demands
for payment in full AND freedom from liability.15
In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported16
that Pfizer was demanding countries put up sovereign assets as
collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its
COVID-19 jab.
Several countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican
Republic and Peru, agreed to this demand, putting up bank reserves,
military bases and embassy buildings as collateral. In short, theses
governments are guaranteeing Pfizer will be compensated for any expenses
resulting from injury lawsuits against it, so the company won’t lose a
dime if its COVID shot injures people.
Shockingly, these terms are binding even if those injuries are the result of negligent company practices, fraud or malice!
In October that same year, Public Citizen published the secret contracts17,18
between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican
Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U.S. and the U.K., further
revealing the extent to which these countries handed power over to
Pfizer. In almost all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests come first.
For example, government purchasers must acknowledge that the
effectiveness and safety of the shots are completely unknown, all while
indemnifying Pfizer against any and all financial liability. This is the
ultimate corporate maleficence, using their leverage to force the kill
shot down these countries’ throats and avoiding any personal
responsibility for damages.
Even if Pfizer eventually is convicted of fraud in the U.S. and loses
all its liability protection from the COVID jabs because of it, that
judgment would not impact these foreign contracts. These countries sold
their souls to Pfizer and have absolutely no recourse but to pay even if
the shots kill everyone.
The contracts for at least four countries also secure Pfizer’s
intellectual property rights even if the company is found to have stolen
intellectual property rights of others. In such case, the government
purchaser becomes the liable party. As explained by Public Citizen:19
“For example, if another vaccine maker sued Pfizer
for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian
government to foot the bill. Pfizer also explicitly says that it does
not guarantee that its product does not violate third-party IP, or that
it needs additional licenses.
Pfizer takes no responsibility in these contracts for
its potential infringement of intellectual property. In a sense, Pfizer
has secured an IP waiver for itself. But internationally, Pfizer is
fighting similar efforts to waive IP barriers for all manufacturers.”
Equally shocking is that countries are forced to follow through on
their vaccine orders even if other drugs or treatments emerge that can
prevent, treat or cure COVID-19.20
Is it any wonder, then, that governments around the world have
suppressed the use of safe and effective outpatient drugs like
hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?
If these drugs were allowed to be used and could be proven to work,
the COVID injections would be completely unnecessary and their emergency
use authorization would disappear, yet governments are on the hook for
hundreds of millions of doses.
Pfizer Has ‘Habitual Offender’ Track Record
The fact that Pfizer has behaved like a criminal who works out a
cover story for a planned murder before committing it is not surprising,
considering its history. Pfizer, has been sued in multiple venues over
unethical behavior, including unethical drug testing and illegal
marketing practices.21
In his 2010 paper,22
“Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” Robert G. Evans, Ph.D., Emeritus
Professor at Vancouver School of Economics, described Pfizer as “a
‘habitual offender,’ persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt
marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial
results.”
Between 2002 and 2010 alone, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined
$3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards.
They are recurrent criminal felons. None of these convictions has
deterred their nefarious behavior.
In 2011, Pfizer agreed to pay another $14.5 million to settle federal charges of illegal marketing,23
and in 2014 they settled federal charges relating to improper marketing
of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million,24
as well as $75 million to settle charges relating to its testing of a
new broad spectrum antibiotic on critically ill Nigerian children.
As reported by the Independent25
at the time, Pfizer sent a team of doctors into Nigeria in the midst of
a meningitis epidemic. For two weeks, the team set up right next to a
medical station run by Doctors Without Borders and began dispensing the
experimental drug, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the
experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic
Rocephin.
Eleven of the children treated by the Pfizer team died, and many
others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure.
Pfizer denied wrongdoing. According to the company, only five of the
children given Trovan died, compared to six who received Rocephin, so
their drug was not to blame.
The problem was they never told the parents that their children were
being given an experimental drug. What’s more, while Pfizer produced a
permission letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter turned
out to have been backdated. The ethics committee itself wasn’t set up
until a year after the trial had already taken place. Pfizer’s rap sheet
also includes bribery, environmental violations, labor and worker
safety violations and more.26
Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
Now, despite Pfizer being one of the least ethical drug companies,
we’re told to trust them with our very lives, and the lives of our
precious children. They’re going to put out booster shots this fall that
have undergone absolutely no testing whatsoever, and we’re to simply
throw caution to the wind because Pfizer — which has no liability
whatsoever — says so.
In 2014, Pfizer faced a surge of lawsuits that accused it of hiding known side effects of its anticholesterol drug Lipitor.27 They got off scot-free that time, as a federal judge dismissed thousands of cases alleging the drug caused Type 2 diabetes.28,29 But at least they had liability and could be sued.
When it comes to the COVID jabs, injured patients and family members
of those killed by it won’t even have the ability to sue for damages, as
governments around the world have indemnified them completely, and it
looks as though they might not even be liable even if they’re found
guilty of fraud. But we will have to see what the courts rule on that
one. Still, that any nation would agree to a contract like that is just
mindboggling.
Meanwhile, mounting evidence shows the COVID shots destroy immune function over time, and Pfizer’s own trial data reveal deaths and serious adverse events numbering in the tens of thousands.
It’s hard to tell who’s more deserving of punishment — Pfizer or the
equally captured federal agencies, the FDA and the CDC, that go along
with them and do nothing to protect the lives of the youngest members of
our society. Clearly, it’s up to us to protect ourselves and our loved
ones, because wolves in sheep’s clothing are ruling the roost — they’re
making all the decisions, and captured agencies are simply doing their
bidding.