In this video, I interview repeat guest Dr. Meryl Nass, who has a monthly podcast with journalist James Corbett on Children's Health Defense (CHD) TV.
Their show is focused on the implementation of the World Health
Organization’s efforts to install global tyranny with respect to health
and global governance.
The implications for public health are enormous and extremely troubling. The WHO is basically laying the foundation to take control over all aspects of everyone’s lives, across the world, under the auspice of “biosecurity.”
In this interview, Nass explains how the WHO is being set up as a
central governing body for the world, and what we can do to stop it. She
also details the price she’s paid for taking a stand against the false
COVID narrative and offering early treatment.
Sacrificial Lamb
Nass was one of the doctors who, during the COVID pandemic, offered
patients early treatment in Maine and Maryland. As a result, her medical
license was suspended and the medical board forced her to undergo
psychiatric evaluation. Apparently, in the present era, doctors who
think saving lives is more important than following unscientific medical
advice created by bureaucrats is considered insanity. She comments:
“This whole pandemic, and the takeover of the world
by ‘elites, (global cabal)’ has been orchestrated primarily through
fear, and one thing that's necessary is to make doctors cooperate. To do
that, the best way is to scare them, and the best way to scare them is
to threaten their medical licenses ...
In July and August
of 2021, there were national news reports of several doctors who were
prescribing ivermectin and [who] were being investigated, but none of
them actually lost their licenses.
Apparently, this was not enough to stop doctors from
prescribing ivermectin, and in states where it was allowed,
hydroxychloroquine. These are both licensed drugs and the federal
government had no legal authority to take them off the menu.
Licensed doctors could prescribe licensed drugs, as
could nurse practitioners, PAs [physician’s assistants], et cetera.
Neither one had a black box warning, neither one was a controlled
substance. They were both safe, and they both had been used for a number
of decades.
So, instead, it had to be done through the states —
because states regulate medical practice in the U.S., and pharmacy
practice — so, about 30 states issued either guidelines or rules to
pharmacists and doctors telling them whether they could prescribe these
drugs and under what circumstances.
That had happened in early 2020. In my case, the
board got an anonymous complaint against me saying I was spreading
misinformation — another charge that the government really needed to
control people on. They couldn't have the truth coming out about COVID,
the drugs, the vaccines, and about this whole takeover.
So, they created this baloney concept of
‘misinformation,’ ‘disinformation’ and ‘malinformation’ and pretended
that it was the law, that people who spread misinformation could be
charged, and had to stop. A whole huge system was created within the
federal government to surveil our online presence and go after people
[who went against the narrative].
So, I was accused, initially, not of using these
drugs, because I used them legally, but of spreading misinformation. And
I think that the feds were looking for an excuse to really scare
doctors ... I was fairly well known.
So they went after me and said, ‘Not only are we
investigating you, but we find, even before an investigation goes
forward, even before any hearing, before the medical board even gets to
see you and you get to say one word to them, we've decided that you are
such a danger to the people of Maine, we must immediately suspend your
license.’ They did that on January 12, 2022.”
Kangaroo Court
Nass has not been able to practice medicine since. Before the first
hearing, the state medical board tried to get her to plea bargain and
surrender her license voluntarily. She refused. By then, she was already
working with CHD, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who founded CHD, offered
to pay for her legal defense.
Of course, before the first hearing, they realized they couldn’t
possibly take Nass to court for misinformation. After all, the First
Amendment allows her to say whatever she wants. So, they dropped the
misinformation charges and charged her with using medications off-label
instead — only, that’s perfectly legal as well.
So, they dropped that charge, and instead argued she’d been speaking
ill of the COVID vaccines. But that wasn’t a winning strategy either,
because, of course, they didn’t want to defend the shots in court.
“So, basically, they went through my records and they
tried to find little piddly things, like my records weren't neat
enough. I had been doing telemedicine and I hadn't written down the
vital signs for a patient, things like that,” Nass says.
“So in the hearings that have gone on so far, we've
managed to shoot down all of those charges. There's nothing substantive,
there's nothing left for them. In fact, the attorney general didn't
even question my last witness, who was Harvey Risch, an emeritus
professor and M.D., Ph.D., from Yale, who blew apart the part-time ER
doctor's testimony that I hadn't done things correctly.
So, that's where we are. They don't have a case, so
what they want to do instead is drag this out forever, which will do two
things that are good for them: One, prevent me from being able to say I
won my case and get national attention for that, because they managed
to put me in the national news when they took my license;
No. 2, they want to cost Children's Health Defense a
whole lot of money by just dragging it out, and it doesn't cost them
anything to drag it out. They've got the assistant attorney generals who
are already working for the state managing the case.
Somebody up there is pulling the strings and figured
out how to make this as painful as possible for myself and CHD. Well, I
want to assure them that it's not painful at all because we've had up to
180,000 people watching each hearing in real time.
CHD and Epoch Times have streamed every one, so
everyone has been able to see what kind of kangaroo court this is, and
the state of Maine has a black eye already. So let's go forward. Let's
give them some more black eyes.”
Most Doctors Are Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Unfortunately, threatening a doctor’s medical license is an
exceptionally effective way to ensure compliance, and an effective
coercion to follow the rules even though they are wholly unlawful. The
reason for this is simple economics. Most doctors owe hundreds of
thousands of dollars in student loans, and unless they’re independently
wealthy, they can’t afford to go into private practice.
That means they work as an employee for a hospital or big clinic,
where the rules are being set by hospital administrators. In addition to
that, medical education is wholly captured by Big Pharma, and has been
for the last 100 years. As such, medical students are being brainwashed
from Day One. On top of that, you have peer pressure.
“We're in the middle of a war,” Nass says. “It's
a war about who gets control of people, and doctors just happened to be
a necessary chess piece for them. By doing this to me and others, the
state has been very successful at getting most doctors to keep their
mouth shut and go along, and comply with what they want.”
Indeed, it takes enormous courage and commitment to patient welfare
to buck a system that has all these built-in pressures. In my estimate,
perhaps only 5% of the 1 million doctors in America took a stand against
the COVID tyranny.
“More than 75% of doctors are employed by somebody else, and that means they don't have a say,” Nass explains. “If
they're employed by a hospital, the hospital bean-counters said, ‘Look,
everybody who comes in is getting remdesivir, that's it, if they're
admitted with COVID.’ And they can't fight back.
There was so much money involved that people who
tried to fight back lost their jobs. And this was what hospitals and
employers were told to do by government and so-called ethicists like Art
Caplan. You fire people and then everybody else goes along. So that's
what happened.
The other thing is ... you can't expect someone to
believe something if their salary depends on their not believing it. So
there's that. The peer pressure is huge, for several reasons. One is
malpractice. If you don't go along with everybody else, you are liable
for malpractice if your patient doesn't do well.
So if I give someone hydroxychloroquine for COVID and
they wind up dying, I can be sued for malpractice because I wasn't
following the standard of care. But if I gave them remdesivir and they
die, I was following the standard of care, and I can't be sued for that.
These are terrible things. This means that the entire
profession has been pushed — through these rules and standards — to do
things wrong. And all of this was probably thought of, or even planned,
long ago, so that it would be relatively easy to control all the
doctors.”
The Global Takeover Is Well Underway
As noted by Nass, most of you who are paying attention will have
noticed that all kinds of crazy things are now happening all at once. We
were mandated to get fast-tracked “vaccines” that turned out to be both
ineffective and extremely dangerous, and even though the proverbial cat
is now out of the bag, government is still trying to pressure people
into taking additional boosters.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has authorized vaccine
manufacturers to make a third, bivalent, version of the mRNA shot, to be
rolled out in the fall in combination with the flu shots.
“Why would that be, when everyone knows that after a
few weeks, [the shots] make you more susceptible to get the disease, as
well as have heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, et cetera, and sudden
death?” Nass asks.
We're also facing the rollout of a central bank digital currency
(CBDC) and an international digital vaccine passport. We also know that
the U.S. government was funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to
design more lethal coronaviruses. Why did they do that? To what end?
We’ve also seen stupendous changes within our school system.
Transgender ideology now trumps everything else. We’ve seen a rapid
growth of online schooling and the lowering of educational standards at
all levels, all while using the right pronoun has become incredibly
important.
We’ve also seen a radical shift away from true environmentalism in
favor of a “green” agenda that forces the poor and middle class to lower
their standard of living while the wealthy profit. The fact is, the
destruction of our environment and the raping of underdeveloped
countries for their natural resources was done by the same globalists
that now blame all of these problems on the public.
“What's going on now is that the ‘elites’ (global
cabal) have somehow gained control of enough pieces of our culture and
our education system, and certainly our mass media and government, to
roll out these cultural concepts and convince people of their validity,” Nass says.
“The elites have decided — they've got the ability
now, through surveillance, through control of media and control of
governments — to take over much of the world. The simplest and most
legal way for them to do that, without having to fight wars, is to take
over public health, and wrap the rest of the world into public health.
So public health is not just between you and your
doctor. Public health now involves wild animals ... They want to control
the interactions of humans and wild animals.
They also want to control what happens with our
livestock ... so, livestock have become part of health. Ecosystems have
also become part of health, and so has everything else. The name for
this is ‘One Health.’
The WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) —
the world organization on animal health — and the UN Environmental
Program, are all pushing for these things to be part of One Health and
public health.
This didn’t happen by chance. It’s a scheme ...
funded by the Rockefeller Foundation around 2009. Many U.S. federal
agencies are supposed to be using the One Health approach. This means
that health problems have to be solved with a whole committee of people,
not just doctors, not just veterinarians, but you need the ecologists,
the plant pathologists, the livestock people, et cetera.
Everybody has to work together. But that's not
enough. You also have to throw in the police. You also have to throw in
governments and legislators and everyone else into this concept of One
Health.”
As noted by Nass, One Health is already enshrined in U.S. law in the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), so there’s no question that
U.S. agencies are all on the same track as the WHO.
Who’s Part of the Global Cabal?
In the interview, Nass goes on to name some of the organizations that
are part of the global cabal that is reworking society for their own
aims. Named players include the Rhodes organization, the Council on
Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and
Chatham House, which is the equivalent of the Council on Foreign
Relations in the U.K.
All these groups, and many more, are linked to each other. Former
U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger cofounded the Trilateral
Commission and was a Rhodes scholar and member of the Council on Foreign
Relations. Kissinger selected Klaus Schwab to create the World Economic
Forum (WEF) in 1971, and they’ve been working together ever since.
In 1993, the WEF founded a Young Global Leaders program to groom
international heads of state. Today, Germany, France, Canada, Finland
and other countries are led by graduates of this program.
“It's not exactly a secret society, but Klaus Schwab
and his group have managed to identify people who would go along with
their program,” Nass says. “I suspect these are people who are not the most intelligent, who lack imagination and are very obedient.
Therefore, they have been convinced that climate
change is a dire emergency, and that they need to take extraordinary
measures to deal with it — even if they have to reduce the population,
even if they have to reduce our standard of living, even if they have to
impose 15-minute cities, get rid of air travel and ... eat bugs.”
How the WHO Is Being Set Up as the Central Authority
As explained by Nass, from its inception in 1948, the WHO has been an
organization that transferred money from wealthier countries to poorer
countries to help them with health problems like tuberculosis, AIDS and
malaria.
During the COVID pandemic, the WHO and diplomats from member
countries decided that a comprehensive pandemic treaty was necessary.
The justification was that COVID had been mismanaged, hence we need a
central decision-maker.
“Of course, what was never said is that things were
managed so poorly because most countries were following the WHO advice,
which was absolutely awful,” Nass says.
If this pandemic treaty goes through, either a regional epidemic or
global pandemic would authorize the WHO to step in and dictate how the
matter should be addressed. WHO members are also working on amendments
to the International Health Regulations (IHRs), which would strip member
nations of their sovereignty to make health-related decisions.
And, recall that “health” is being redefined to include all aspects
of life, under the already existing One Health paradigm. As Nass
explains:
“What has been proposed is that either a regional
director-general or the WHO director-general can simply declare a public
health emergency of international concern, or the potential for a
public health emergency of international concern.
Once they make that declaration, all these powers
would then accrue to the director-general of the WHO, if it's for all
countries, or if it's regional, to that regional director-general.
That person could then say, ‘OK, medicines in your
country need to be shipped to this other country.’ Intellectual property
on how to make vaccines need to go away. Let's say Abbott has a vaccine
to combat whatever it is. They have to now give the recipe to Rwanda so
they can make that vaccine in their own country and use it for their
own people.
They can close borders. The WHO director-generals
could basically take control of anything. If they say, ‘Oh, people are
getting this from animals,’ they can stop contact with animals, stop you
eating chicken or whatever, because One Health has taken jurisdiction
over ecosystems.
The entire planet is ecosystems, and that's part of
One Health. Animals and plants are also part of One Health. So, they can
tell you what to eat, they can tell you where to go and where not to
go. They can lock you in your home. They can put masks on you, they can
mandate vaccinations — if these [IHR] amendments and the pandemic treaty
are passed.
They're still being negotiated. The final versions
are not out. But we have certainly criticized and analyzed the early
versions, and they will be voted on next May [2024], and could
potentially go into force on a provisional basis. The treaty could go
into force almost immediately.”
How These Instruments Alter the WHO’s Existing Authority
In many ways, it seems the WHO was already exercising these powers,
or at least attempting to, during the COVID pandemic. So, how do these
two instruments — the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty — alter
their existing authority? Nass explains:
“There are existing international health regulations
and they've been in existence since at least 1969 ... Although the WHO
claims that part of the IHRs that exist right now are binding, they
aren't binding. So, countries followed them, but there was no legal
requirement for them to do so.
The International Health Regulations stated very
clearly that the way they were to be carried out was with ‘full respect
for freedom of persons’ dignity and human rights.’ In the new version
that is being negotiated, they have struck that out. There is no longer a
need to respect human rights, dignity or freedom of persons.
And, they have specifically said that these new
regulations will be binding on countries, and countries are required to
have a focal point that is required to carry them out and report back to
the WHO how they've been carried out.
There are additional new provisions that countries
are required to perform surveillance of their populations. They want you
to think this is surveillance of only bacteria or surveillance of only
social media, but it's both. So, the WHO could require people to be
swabbed in your country, whether or not they're crossing a border.
Say there's an outbreak. Everybody has to line up and
get swabbed to see if they're infected with X. And animals have to be
surveilled as well, because they're looking for pathogens that have the
potential to be become pandemics. So that is supposed to happen.
Now, there's a huge problem with that, and that is,
you can always find viruses that have the potential to become pandemics
... So, if you start surveilling for them, you're going to find them,
which means that would allow the director-general of the WHO to declare a
public health emergency anytime he or she wants.
The other surveillance is they require countries to
surveil their social media and mainstream media, and censor anything
that goes against the public health messaging of the WHO. So this is
big. This is huge.”
Is Global Tyranny an Inevitability?
While it may seem there’s no way to derail this proverbial bullet
train, Nass remains optimistic. “This is a dystopian future that
actually is not good for anybody. Even the people who want it are going
to find it's not good for them either,” Nass says.
Now, the global cabal that is trying to seize control have access to
essentially unlimited capital. But they’re also using our tax dollars.
As noted by Nass, the U.S. government has spent some $5 trillion on the
pandemic response.
“That's our money, not theirs,” she says, “and a lot of that money,
most likely, went to bribe media.” Hospitals were also paid to go along
with the narrative, as were celebrities, churches, medical groups and
other social organizations.
“These very wealthy people do not want to spend their
own money to take over the world. They want to spend our money or put
us in debt. But are these expenditures justified and legal?
If we get governments of people who are responsive to
normal life, we can investigate where that money went. What are these
public officials doing? We can put them on trial, and we can probably
even claw back a lot of this money.
Now, to do that might require some new laws, but if
we had really good people in office — like Bobby Kennedy — we could
potentially create the laws, very quickly, that will allow us to try
government officials and others, heads of media, et cetera, if they're
doing things that are against the law.”
Why We Need New Laws
The reason we need new laws is because current laws give immunity to a
lot of bad actors, including the Federal Reserve, the Bank of
International Settlements, everybody who works for the WHO and the UN,
and federal government employees as well as many private organizations.
Vaccines and their manufacturers are also indemnified. We need to
pass new laws that eliminate all these indemnifications, so that we can
retroactively take them to court for the crimes they’ve committed.
“This whole thing goes against the principles of the
Constitution, the principles of natural law. This is a dystopian
nightmare that was figured out by some very clever people in public
relations and in consulting groups. We know the French government paid
something like €1 billion or €2 billion to McKinsey to help manage the
pandemic response.
So we can identify organizations that have brought
these things on us and go after them. We also need to tell our members
of Congress, our parliamentarians, and legislators, we don't want this
dystopia. Government doesn't give us rights. We have rights. We are
giving government authority. Government doesn't have authority and own
us. We own the government.
We've been led to believe that it's the other way
around, but it isn't. And we can fix all this. There are about 50
members of Congress already who have signed on as co-sponsors to HR79
[the WHO Withdrawal Act1]. We need to get out of these international organizations.
The UN is trying to do something similar. The WHO was
simply pulled in because there was an opportunity to gain control
legally through the WHO because of the way its constitution exists,
because of several Supreme Court cases, et cetera, there was an ability
to use the WHO. The cabal may try to use other international
organizations or other means to gain control.
But look, there's a few thousand of them. There's 8
billion of us. This is like a million to one. We can beat them. We don't
have to go along with any of it. If everybody says no, if the police
don't enforce, if the Army doesn't enforce, it's not going to happen. So
people just need to realize what's going on.”
Door to Freedom
To that end, Nass is working with a new organization called Door to Freedom.
Their website, which will launch shortly, will contain all the relevant
WHO and UN documents, criticisms of those documents, and both long and
short explanations of what's going on.
It’ll be a one-stop shop where everyone can learn what the plan is
and what we can do to stop it. Door to Freedom also hopes to align
freedom organizations around the world to act in concert to get the word
out more widely.
Personally, I'm skeptical about the likelihood of winning this battle
through legislative efforts because this cabal has been working on this
plan for decades, if not centuries. So, they already have everything
buttoned up, or close to it. Perhaps someone like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
could get it done, but it will take a small miracle to get him into
office as well.
What I do hold out hope for is that public resistance will block
attempts of implementation. So, the key, I think, is to educate people.
Henceforth, most of the day-to-day choices you make will take the world
either closer to freedom, or closer to slavery, so it’s crucial to
understand where we are, where the cabal intends to take us, and how
they intend to get us there.
That way, you can make decisions and take actions that will move us
in the opposite direction. Door to Freedom will be able to help you
understand all of that, so please bookmark doortofreedom.org, and check back regularly.