As soon as it was announced that
COVID-19 would be combated with novel mRNA gene transfer technology, a
number of scientists spoke out against it with dire warnings about
potential health ramifications, including the theory that fertility
might be adversely impacted.
In the two years since the rollout of these COVID shots, our worst
fears have come true. Still, mainstream media feign surprise. Case in
point: The Washington Post recently reported that “Pregnancy
complications spiked during the pandemic” and “no one knows exactly
why.”1
Aside from COVID-19 itself, the COVID shots are the only thing that
has impacted a vast majority of the population worldwide during this
timeframe, and everywhere the same effects are reported. To claim “no
one knows why” is to ignore the proverbial elephant in the room as its
tail is swatting you in the face and its trumpet sound threatens to
shatter your eardrums.
Both Virus and Shots May Have Similar Impacts on Pregnancy
The Washington Post seems to go out of its way to not implicate the
COVID shots, laying all the blame on the virus itself. But even then,
they fail to address the fact that it’s the spike protein that is the
most likely culprit. The obvious reason for that is because the spike
protein is also what your body produces in response to the COVID shots.
However, when you read things like, “last fall and winter, Amy
Heerema McKenney, a Cleveland Clinic pathologist ... began receiving
eerily similar reports of stillbirths,” you realize that “last fall and
winter” refers to the winter of 2021, not 2020 or 2019.
In other words, we’re talking about a
time when most people had received one or more mRNA shots, while the
virus itself had mutated into milder forms that were rarely associated
with severe blood clotting issues and other anomalies.
That said, it’s by no means impossible that SARS-CoV-2, even in its
milder expressions, might have an adverse impact on pregnancy. After
all, we’re likely talking about a genetically engineered bioweapon.
The respiratory effects may have mutated to be less severe while
other organs may still be more adversely impacted by the spike protein.
We also have the “shedding” issue to contend with, so just because a
woman is unjabbed doesn’t mean she’s not affected by COVID jab spike
protein.
Unique Damage to the Placenta
The Washington Post goes on to describe what McKenney was finding in the winter of 2021:
“Almost as soon as she began looking into [the
stillbirths], Heerema McKenney recalled, she became ‘pretty panicked.’ A
normal placenta is spongy and dark, reflecting the nourishing blood
flowing through it. The ones she was looking at in her lab from the
mothers who lost their babies were like nothing she had ever seen
before: firm, scarred and more of a shade of tan.
‘The degree of devastation was unique,’ she said.
Flipping through case files, she noted that most of the women were in
their second trimester, unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated, and
infected with the coronavirus within a two-week window before their
pregnancies ending.
Heerema McKenney herself saw fewer than 20
potentially coronavirus-related stillbirths over about six months. But
her findings matched up with cases colleagues were seeing in other parts
of the world.
And they also echoed those in a paper from Ireland
that looked at seven cases — six stillbirths and one second-trimester
fetal death in pregnant people infected with the coronavirus — resulting
from what the authors called ‘a readily recognizable pattern of
placental injury.’ She said, ‘That's when we realized we were all
looking at the same thing.’"
While McKenney claims most were either unjabbed or partially jabbed,
other evidence clearly implicate the COVID shots. For example, in
November 2021, Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia
(BC), delivered an astonishing 13 stillborn babies in a 24-hour period,
and all of the mothers had received the COVID jab.2 In a typical month, there may be one stillborn baby at the hospital, making 13 stillbirths in 24 hours highly unusual.
Types of Pregnancy Complications on the Rise
That something is terribly wrong is clear from global statistics. Around the world, women are reporting abnormal menses3 and vaginal hemorrhaging,4 both post-COVID5 and after exposure to the jab6,7 or someone who got the shot. Birth rates have significantly dropped, and we’re seeing significant upticks in preeclampsia,8 miscarriages,9,10,11,12,13 premature births,14 early puberty, as well as maternal and infant deaths.
According to a research letter15
in JAMA published in late June 2022, maternal deaths in the U.S. rose
from 18.8 per 100,000 live births prepandemic, to 25.1 per 100,000 live
births during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020, a relative
increase of 33.3%.
That increase can be attributed to COVID-19, since no COVID shots
were available in 2020. We don’t yet have the statistics for 2021 and
2022, but based on obituaries and social media posts, it seems many new
mothers are now dying “suddenly” and for no apparent reason. Time will
tell, but I doubt the trend has gotten any better after the rollout of
the COVID shots for pregnant women.
More Vaccines for Pregnant Women
Despite the clear risks of vaccinating during pregnancy, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration recently approved a whooping cough vaccine
for newborns that is given to mothers in the third trimester. This is
the first vaccine aimed at infants that is to be preemptively given to
the mother during pregnancy. According to Pharmacy Times:16
“Since children aged 2 months of age or younger are
not eligible to receive an actual vaccine themselves, administering the
Tdap vaccine to the mother can boost the infant’s immune system by
boosting antibodies in the mother, who then transfers the antibodies to
the developing fetus ...
According to the CDC, although only 4.2% of US cases
occur in this age group, 31% of infants who contract the disease who are
also younger than 6 months go to the hospital due to the illness.”
Swedish Journalist Critiques American Reporting
In an early October 2022 commentary in the Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan,17,18
journalist and author Johan Anderberg expressed being perplexed by The
New York Times’ jubilant announcement this past summer that toddlers
could finally get the COVID shot.
“For a reader on the other side of the Atlantic, the
reporting on infant vaccination appeared somewhat puzzling,” Anderberg
writes. “In most European countries, citizens had long since stopped
caring about the pandemic, and in Denmark, the head of public health,
Soren Brostrom, had even said that it was a mistake to vaccinate
children between the ages of 5 and 11.
But for the New York Times — and its subscribers —
this was a big event. When the magazine asked its readers to send in
stories about what it was like to live with unvaccinated toddlers, they
received 1,600 responses. Several of them said their children had never
been allowed to play with friends or meet their relatives indoors.
At the end of the summer, the first numbers came out
on how many Americans had actually vaccinated their toddlers in the
first month. It turned out fewer than 5% of American children under the
age of 5 had received their first injection.
Not so long ago, those kinds of numbers would have
been thought provoking for a newspaper like the New York Times: Did we
have an incorrect picture of the mood in the country? ... Was there a
perspective on the issue that we missed? But it no longer works that
way.”
He goes on to describe how The New York Times has changed from “all
the news that’s fit to print” into a publication that cherry picks its
stories based on political bias and a preconceived agenda, and rarely
ever presents more than one viewpoint anymore.
Had they been more journalistically inclined and less biased, they
would not have gotten the COVID-jab-for-infants’ story so wrong. Many
Americans also “received a blatantly incorrect picture of the risks with
the new coronavirus through The New York Times reporting,” Anderberg
writes.
The New York Times’ fallacies spread as far and as high as the
Supreme Court, where Supreme Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor publicly
overstated the number of serious COVID infections among children by
2,000%. That enormous flub was a direct result of depending on
mainstream sources with an agenda to spread fear rather than truth.
Vaccines and Bioweapons Are One Industry
The fact that we have no real independent press anymore has become
painfully clear over the past three years. What we have are
corporate-government propaganda outlets and censored alternative media.
There’s not much in between.
Certainly, you rarely ever find both sides of an issue covered by the
same media outlet anymore. Media has become incredibly polarized and,
with it, the population at large. As noted by Anderberg, the mainstream
press has played a key role in this polarization, as it has abandoned
rules of journalism such as unbiased research and reportage and
presenting more than one side of every story.
The reason for this appears to be because media are owned and
controlled by those who benefit from the pandemic. In short, media’s
refusal to state the obvious is because the obvious doesn’t fit the
narrative that we must surrender our freedom for biosecurity’s sake.
But the promise of biosecurity is itself a lie. Not only is
SARS-CoV-2 a bioweapon, but the COVID shot is too. Once people realize
that the vaccine industry and the bioweapons industry have become one and the same, the big picture will become clearer.
COVID Shots Are Weapons of Mass Destruction
These shots may have many purposes, but none of them is to protect your health. They may be part of a depopulation agenda. They may be part of an ongoing experiment to perfect some aspect of the transhumanist goal to merge man with AI and synthetic biology. They may have a social engineering purpose. They’re undoubtedly part of the global takeover effort by the New World Order/Great Reset cabal.
But they’re not part of a benevolent public health program. If they
were, the corporate-government alliance would not have spent billions to
first entice and bribe people into taking the shots (remember those
million-dollar lotteries?), and later shame, bully and threaten to
ostracize from society or outright kill the unvaccinated.
If COVID-19 were a naturally-occurring virus, then scientists, media,
Big Tech and bioweapons chief Dr. Anthony Fauci would not have gone out
of their way to suppress and censor debate about its origin.
Similarly, if the COVID shots were a novel but beneficial
intervention for an unprecedented health crisis, the input and feedback
of scientists around the world would have been welcomed rather than
censored. (Ditto for doctors’ feedback on successful treatments. If
saving lives was the goal, all suggestions would have been welcomed.)
The reason no one, regardless of qualifications, is permitted to
speak about the dangers of these shots is because they’re supposed to be
dangerous. They’re bioweapons. The mindset of those pushing for a post-human transhumanist world may be complex (if not incomprehensible), but the strategy to achieve their desired ends is that simple.
Mankind Is Being Regressed Into Oblivion
Mankind is being decimated by not just one but several different
bioweapons — the original virus and a steady stream of ever-changing
gene influencing shots. In the process, survivors of the next
generation, children born and growing up in these times, are being robbed of intelligence, health and life span.
Mankind is quite literally being regressed. The Big
Pharma-biotech-bioweapons complex are risking everything, the very
future of mankind itself, in this effort to “reset” the world and shape
it to their own liking and benefit.
Many worry about a nuclear World War III between nations but, in
reality, World War III has already begun. The transhumanist-centered
pharma-bioweapons industry has spent the last two years decimating its
enemy — mankind — using the most sophisticated biowarfare and social
engineering tools the world has ever seen.
Learn to Say No
The primary defense we have against these attacks is the word “no.”
If enough of us simply reject whatever they roll out next and work on
building our own parallel systems, we can preserve life and liberty for
coming generations.
The globalist cabal is using bioweapons, but we can refuse to take
them. They’re using sophisticated social engineering, but we can educate
ourselves on their tactics, thereby insulating ourselves against their
programming. They’re tearing down the infrastructure we depend on for
life, including the financial system, the health care system and the
food system, but we can replace them with ethical and pro-human
alternatives.
We don’t have to agree to their “solutions,” which are coming, and
will include living in smart cities with digital identities, a social
credit score, surveillance down to your biological processes and a
programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC), all of which will
render you into a 21st century slave with a digital choke chain around
your neck. Avoiding that fate won’t be easy. It certainly won’t be
convenient. But it’ll be worth it.