In the video above, which is part of a
larger "Great Reset" documentary series, Rebel News highlights the
origins of the World Economic Forum1 (WEF), its founder Klaus Schwab, and other key players, and the WEF's central role in The Great Reset, which promises (read: threatens) to overturn society and life as we know it in ways that are hard to imagine.
In summary, The Great Reset involves the demolition and radical
overhaul of several interlocking pillars of civilization: technology,
society, economy, environment and geopolitics. Food and health also fall
within these categories. Through control of these core pillars, the WEF
and its globalist allies intend to seize control of all the nations of
the world and centralize all power and wealth.
The WEF's Plan
As noted by Rebel News, the WEF is an organization that profits from
famine and disease; it uses tragedies and fear to further its own agenda
— "one that dictates what you eat, what you own, what you think, under
the guise of a 'sustainable future.'"
According to the WEF, capitalism is dead and we can no longer allow
for free markets. Instead, we need a top-down governance, a New World
Order, that can ensure "fair and equitable" distribution of dwindling
resources, including energy and food. What they're really saying,
however, is that soon-to-be-useless people are gobbling up "their"
resources. They see us — you and me — as an existential threat to their
luxurious lifestyle.
So, their decades-old plan is to seize control of it all, transfer
all wealth and private ownership into their own hands, and centrally
control who gets what and when. It's important to realize that this
WEF-led cabal believes in transhumanist and technocratic principles.
What Is Technocracy?
Technocracy is at its core an
economic system, not a political one. However, it's wholly unnatural,
and therefore also requires unnatural means to keep it going. Rather
than being based on common pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand
or free commerce, the economy of technocracy is based on energy
resources, which then dictate the types of products being produced,
bought, sold and consumed.
In essence, energy replaces the concept of money as a commodity.
That's strange enough, but it gets stranger still. Technocracy, which
emerged in the 1930s during the height of the Great Depression, the
brainchildren of which were scientists and engineers, also requires
social engineering to work.
If people are allowed to do what they want, consumer demand
ultimately drives commerce, but that won't fly in a technocratic
economy. Instead, consumers need to be directed, herded if you will, to
consume that which the system needs them to consume, and in order for
that to happen, they need to be more or less brainwashed. As a result,
the technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial
intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check.
Understanding the Mind of the Technocrats
As Schwab himself has declared on many occasions, they want a society
in which humans are merged with machine and artificial intelligence
(AI). They look forward to extreme longevity, if not immortality through
technological means.
They place no value on spiritual ideas such as the survival of the
soul. They don't believe in the nonlocality of consciousness. If they
did, they wouldn't believe consciousness can simply be uploaded into a
synthetic body. They believe that, through technology and AI, they will
be able to replace God and the natural order with reengineered lifeforms
of their own creation, including a reengineered humanity.
They actually believe they're better, more evolved than the rest of
us, and this superiority gives them the right to decide the fate of
mankind. They also reject the notion of free will.2
Once you understand this basic mindset, it's easier to understand why
they think nothing of stripping you of your freedom and ability to make
choices for yourself. As noted by Tessa Lena in "The Mind of a Technocrat: What Drives Them?":
"To a technocrat, a human being is an imperfect
machine, a humble meat bag that is operated by software, which is
produced by the brain. The technocrat's understanding of life is based
on a very primitive, linear vision; it's void of spiritual mystery ...
The force driving the mind of a technocrat is the
overbearing emotional need for total control, combined with mistrust for
other people in general. They seemingly look to compensate for their
emotional poverty. (In other words, there is no reason to admire their
successes as their successes are based on theft of other people's right
to free will.)
The technocrats' desire to fully control their
surroundings is anxiety-driven. They simply can't stand the feeling of
uncertainty that comes with allowing other people's subjective choices
to play any role. They don't trust others to do the right thing, much
like a very neurotic parent doesn't trust his child's ability to choose
wisely without supervision — but far less benevolently.
Their desire for control is intensely neurotic. They
are sitting on needles, so to speak (a Russian idiom and a pun in the
light of today) — and in order to dampen their anxiety, they resort to
trying to implement their controlling ambitions ...
Technocrats may think they are the cream of the crop.
They may think that their brilliant vision is good for the world. But
regardless of whether they believe themselves to be the good guys or the
bad guys, their thirst for total control is a pathological,
anxiety-driven expression. They can't stand being dependent on other
people's free will, and so they aspire to squash it, which is not
existentially right."
Annual Meeting in Davos
Each year, the WEF holds a meeting in Davos, Switzerland. Thousands
of global movers and shakers fly in on private jets to decide how best
to stop the working class from driving gas-powered cars, heating their
homes and eating meat. Does anyone still believe that a bunch of
billionaire "elites" can make life "fair and equitable" for everyone?
Attendees include corporate executives, bankers and financiers, heads
of state, finance and trade ministers, central bankers, policymakers,
the heads of international organizations such as the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the
Bank for International Settlements, the United Nations and the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Many academics, economists, political scientists, journalists, cultural elites and celebrities are also invited.
This year's meeting took place May 22 through 26.3
On the first day, participants were treated to an immersive experience
of the metaverse in their own digital avatar. Essentially, this is where
they want to bring the masses of mankind — into a digital reality where
enjoyment of resources doesn't involve actual use of real-world
resources. For example, rather than buying clothes for your biological
body, you'll spend digital currency on a wardrobe for your digital
avatar.
Day 2 included a discussion about how manufacturing companies can
accelerate their implementation of automation. The idea is to replace
most of the human workforce with robotics and AI. As you might expect,
this will render large portions of humanity superfluous and "useless."
What to do with them all? Professor Yuval Noah Harari, a Schwab adviser,
has stated he believes the answer will be a combination of "drugs and
video games."4
Haves and Have Nots Among Journalists
>>>>> Click here <<<<<
Among the journalists invited to the 2022 meeting was New York Times
managing editor Rebecca Blumenstein. Rebel News reporter Avi Yemini
confronted Blumenstein in Davos (video above), asking how the public is
supposed to trust the NYT's reporting on the event when she's an invited
guest. Blumenstein refused to answer the question, thereby cementing
the impression that she's really not there as an independent journalist.
She's part of the event. She's part of the club.
Additional evidence that not all journalists are equal was evidenced
by the attempt by armed WEF police officers to detain conservative
journalist Jack Posobiec (video below).5
When other journalists got involved and started filming and asking
questions, the police took off. The fact that the WEF has ITS OWN police
force should be a wakeup call. Clearly, they're far more than just
another nongovernmental organization (NGO).
Sustainable Development Is Technocracy
Many of the terms we've heard more and more of in recent years refer
to technocracy under a different name. Examples include sustainable
development, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, the New Urban Agenda, green
economy, the green new deal and the climate change movement in general.
They all refer to and are part of technocracy and resource-based
economics. Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the
Great Reset,6 the Fourth Industrial Revolution7 and the slogan Build Back Better.8 The Paris Climate Agreement is also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda.
The common goal of all these movements and agendas is to capture all
of the resources of the world — the ownership of them — for a small
global elite group that has the know-how to program the computer systems
that will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone. It's really the
ultimate form of totalitarianism.
When they talk about "wealth redistribution," what they're really
referring to is the redistribution of resources from us to them. The WEF
has publicly announced that by 2030, you will own nothing. Everything
you need you will rent — from them — and deciding factors for what
you're allowed to rent will include things like your carbon credits and
social credit score.
Gone will be the days of putting in a day's work, receiving a
paycheck and spending it to your heart's content. No, the digital
currency will be programmable, so the issuer can decide when and what
you can spend it on, based on the data in your digital identity. This
will all be automated and run by AI, of course, so there won't be anyone
to complain to.
What the Green Revolution Is All About
While "going green" sounds and feels like the right thing to do, it's
becoming imperative for people to understand what the green agenda is
really all about. Shocking as it may sound, the green agenda was
invented, fabricated, by the Club of Rome (a scientific think tank
allied with the WEF) to justify a depopulation agenda.9
The need for population control is described in the 1972 book, "The Limits to Growth,"10
which warned that "if the world's consumption patterns and population
growth continued at the same high rates of the time, the earth would
strike its limits within a century."
Then, in the 1991 book, "The First Global Revolution,"11
the Club of Rome argued that depopulation policies might gain
widespread support if they could be linked to an existential fight
against a common enemy. An excerpt from "The First Global Revolution"
reads:12
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can
unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global
warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill."
So, in plain English, the intended result of "going green" is
depopulation. This intention is now finally becoming visible when you
consider the implications of eliminating oil and gas production without
having viable alternatives in place, which is what Biden and other
global leaders are in the process of doing.
Not only do you need oil to make fertilizer, but we also don't have
farm equipment that can run on solar or wind power. So, food production
essentially grinds to a halt. Heavy construction machinery also can't
run on these alternative sources of energy, so there go the
infrastructure and home building businesses.
To many, it seems these global leaders are acting out of ignorance,
but it's quite possible their actions are intentional. It's just that no
one wants to consider that the intention is to harm as many people as
possible — to actually rid the planet of soon-to-be "useless" people.
It may be quite chilling to realize that the climate change threat
narrative was cooked up in the late 1980s for the sole purpose of being
able to implement a global depopulation agenda without stirring up
excessive resistance. But depopulation and eugenics are at the heart of
what the WEF and its allies are trying to achieve.
The WEF even admits they're using the Club of Rome's "planetary
emergency plan" to provide "a new compass for nations" to follow.13 So, the WEF and its allied nations are all following a plan that has depopulation as an admitted intended end result.
Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War
As I discussed in "Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War,"
the drums of war are also part and parcel of The Great Reset plan. Why?
Because war will accelerate the economic collapse required before
nations can "Build Back Better."14 The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is helping to catalyze The Great Reset in a number of different ways.
For starters, supply chains of all kinds are being disrupted at an
unprecedented level and pace by the war between Russia and Ukraine. Fuel
shortages and inflation are also taking off. Geopolitical tensions may
also trigger stagflation, an economic situation in which inflation and
unemployment rates are high while economic growth slows.15
It's a precarious dilemma for economic policy, because strategies
that help lower inflation can also make unemployment worse. You can
learn more about this in the March 10, 2022, Conversation article, "Why
Stagflation Is an Economic Nightmare."16
The end result is increased dependence on government subsidies, and
this is a clear goal of The Great Reset. Universal basic income is one
planned strategy that will create dependency. It will also ensure we're
all equally poor and unable to threaten their monopoly on power and
wealth.
Universal poverty is really what they mean when they talk about
making the world "fair and equitable." No one will have anything.
Everyone will be equally poor and dependent, without hope of ever being
able to rise into the "elite" technocratic class.
The Ukraine war is also reducing Europe's reliance on Russian energy,
thereby reinforcing the urgency of the United Nations Sustainable
Development Goals. In lockstep with The Great Reset, policymakers around
the world are using the sanctions against the Russian energy sector to
accelerate the transition to "green" energy, the intention behind which
is what I just discussed.
Russia's decision to block exports of fertilizer and food crops in
response to being deplatformed from the Swift system will also create
food shortages, and this too plays right into the Great Reset plan. In
recent years, we've been urged by Great Reset front men like Bill Gates
to stop eating real meat and switch to synthetic lab-grown meat instead.
Making people reliant on patented synthetic food will benefit the
globalists in more ways than one. People will get sicker, and hence more
reliant on government aid. They'll be dependent on food produced by
monopolies and hence easier to control. And, over time, as people forget
how to grow and raise food, the ability to control the global
population will increase.
In addition to all of this, media are chumming the waters with fearporn about monkeypox — just in time for the push to relinquish national sovereignty to the World Health Organization, which is also allied with the WEF.
In closing, Michael Osterholm's report from the 2010 Davos meeting,
which was aflame with talks about pandemic planning, having just gone
through the 2009/2010 swine flu pandemic is quite telling. All those
years ago, he wrote:17
"I learned much in Davos, but I was troubled by the complete lack of attention to such critical questions as:
- How do we protect global supply chains when we face another inevitable pandemic that could bring about widespread, severe illness? ...
- How do we take the lessons we've learned from our experience with H1N1 and embed them into our organizations so they're not forgotten?
Instead, the tenor of the conversations at Davos was about globalization ..."
Twelve years ago, the Davos billionaires, bankers and heads of state
had the opportunity to prove they were capable of stewarding this Earth
ship. But after the swine flu pandemic, they didn't solve the problems
that had become apparent.
They didn't solve the supply chain issues, and we had the same but
worse issues when COVID came along. The only thing they solved was how
to silence the critics. Back then, there was talk that "heads should
roll" because of mismanagement of the pandemic.
Well, no heads rolled. Everything stayed the same, and now we've gone
through two years of the worst pandemic mismanagement imaginable. Now,
the globalist cabal is pushing for the inept WHO to become the sole
decision-maker in pandemics, which the WHO would be able to declare at
will, based on its own definitions. We're at a very dangerous
crossroads.
We have to remember, though, that the fate of the world is not for
Schwab and the Davos crowd to decide. It's ours. If we do not resist
their plans, we've made the choice to accept their version of the
future.