The globalist cabal wants to monopolize
health systems worldwide, and a stealth attack is already underway in
the form of an international pandemic treaty.1 The negotiations for this treaty began March 3, 2022.2 As reported by The Pulse (video above):
“Coming off the back of the COVID-19 pandemic, the
World Health Organization is proposing a new pandemic treaty they’re
hoping will be accepted by enough member countries to become a reality
by 2024.”
According to Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, “me-first”
approaches “stymie the global solidarity needed” to address global
threats. His solution? Give the WHO all the power.
Over the past two years, in the name of keeping everyone “safe” from
infection, the globalists have justified unprecedented attacks on
democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to
choose your own medical treatment. Now, the WHO wants to make its
pandemic leadership permanent, and to extend it into the health care
systems of every nation.
Treaty Threatens National Sovereignty
As noted by The Pulse, “there are a number of things in the treaty
that the people of the world need to consider before going down this
path.” In the featured video, The Pulse’s Joe Martino interviews Shabnam
Palesa Mohamed, a member of the steering committee of the World Council
for Health, who points out that the treaty gives the WHO:
“... an inordinate amount of power to make decisions
in sovereign countries as to how people live and how they deal with
pandemics, from lockdowns to mandates over treatment.”
In short, it would create a one-size-fits-all approach to disease,
without regard for all the varying situations found in individual
countries, and this is something we already know doesn’t work. The
treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions
for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.
At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of
dollars to participate in this process. As explained by Mohamed, the
treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health
Assembly in 2023. They need a majority for it to pass and, if passed,
all member countries will be bound by it.
The Treaty Is ‘Invalid and Unlawful’
Another concern raised by Mohamed is that many countries don’t even
know about this treaty as of yet, and it’s possible that the WHO might
try to push for earlier implementation than 2024 — all without public
participation or input. “It is undemocratic, it is unconstitutional and
therefore it makes the treaty invalid and unlawful,” she says.
She also highlights the WHO’s history of corruption and many health
policy failures, which are “intrinsically linked to conflicts of
interest.” In an open letter on the WHO’s pandemic treaty, the World
Council for Health writes, in part:3
“The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a
threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’s
suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing
lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments
against the will of the people.
The WCH [World Council for Health] believes that the
people have a right to participate in any agreement that affects their
lives, livelihoods, and well-being.
However, the WHO has not engaged in a process of
public participation, which is evidence that its priority is capturing
more power for itself and its corporate accomplices, than serving the
interests of the people. Without an unbiased democratic process, any
agreement by the WHO, acting via the United Nations, will be unlawful,
illegitimate, and invalid.
Historically, the WHO leadership has failed the
people. Among many examples, it approved the injurious H1N1 (swine flu)
vaccine for a controversially declared pandemic.
Equally, the WHO failed during the COVID-19 chapter
as it encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments, and
recommended product interventions that have proven to be neither safe
nor effective.
The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s
health agenda, nor enforce biosurveillance. While it receives funding
from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual
conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from
private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit
from WHO decisions and mandates.
For example, the Gates Foundation and the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine promotion alliance, contribute over $1 billion a year.”
Another concern is the fact that when people are harmed by the WHO’s
health policies, there’s no accountability because the WHO has
diplomatic immunity. According to Mohamed, “the WHO should not be making
ANY decisions about world health in the future.”
The Ultimate Power Grab
As noted by Martino, while the treaty claims to be focused on
pandemic planning and responses, there’s serious concern that it could
be expanded to cover other areas of health as well. Mohamed agrees,
saying that it could potentially be expanded, using the WHO’s
constitution as the basis for that expansion. Article 2 of the WHO’s
constitution states:
“In order to achieve its objective, the functions of
the Organization shall be: a) to act as the directing and coordinating
authority on international health work ... k) to propose conventions,
agreements and regulations, and make recommendations with respect to
international health matters ...
s) to establish and revise as necessary international
nomenclatures of diseases, of causes of death and of public health
practices ... v) generally to take all necessary action to attain the
objective of the Organization.”
Its power is already very significant, and the goal to turn the WHO
into a global health dictatorship is virtually written into its
constitution. Also, remember that the WHO removed the specificity of
mass casualties from the definition of a pandemic, so now a pandemic can
be just about any disease that occurs in multiple countries. Even
obesity could theoretically qualify. So, the WHO could claim power over
health care systems in any number of ways, given the chance.
Treaty Would Grant WHO Power to Mandate Vaccine Passports
While most of the world is more than ready to move on, the WHO seems
unwilling to let go. A WHO official recently told the Ottawa Citizen
that the COVID pandemic is still “far from over.”4
The reason for this reluctance to declare the pandemic over is likely
because the WHO hopes to gain the power to mandate vaccine passports
and COVID jabs worldwide. It’s already working on the creation of a
global vaccine passport/digital identity program. As reported by WEBLYF:5
“Under the guise of a ‘trust network,’ another
initiative called Vaccination Credential Initiative (VCI) is also
gaining momentum.
Partnering with big tech companies, big corporations,
and big universities, VCI describes itself as ‘a voluntary coalition of
public and private organizations committed to empowering individuals
with access to verifiable clinical information including a trustworthy
and verifiable copy of their vaccination records in digital or paper
form using open, interoperable standards.’
VCI’s SMART Health Cards, as reported by
Off-Guardian, are already implemented by ‘25 states in America, plus
Puerto Rico and DC, and have become the US’s de-facto national
passport.’ As explained in the article:
‘The US government, unlike many European countries,
has not issued their own official vaccine passport, knowing such a move
would rankle with the more Libertarian-leaning US public, not to mention
get tangled in the question of state vs federal law.
The SMART cards allow them to sidestep this issue.
They are technically only implemented by each state individually via
agreements with VCI, which is technically a private entity. However,
since the SMART cards are indirectly funded by the US government, their
implementation across every state makes them a national standard in all
but name.’”
United Tribes of New Zealand Denounce the WHO Treaty
As noted by NZDSOS,6
“Is this the way we want to live our lives? Constantly at the behest of
shadowy individuals and corporations who monitor our every move and
determine what we can and can’t do, down to buying food?”
In a formal letter of notification to the WHO and the Executive Board
of the World Health Assembly, the government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni in
New Zealand strongly denounced this and any other treaty that challenges
national sovereignty:7
“... you are thereby formally notified that the
Wakaminenga Māorigovernment of Aotearoa Nu Tireni/New Zealand does not
consent in any shape of form to any type of international pandemic
treaty under the WHO or its assembly. Any such construct shall be void
ab initio.
We, as United Tribes and Hereditary Chiefs, represent
the only current legitimate government in New Zealand. The current NZ
government represented by Jacinda Ardern is an illegitimate government
because it is a corporation (SEC CIK #0000216105) listed on the US
Security & Exchange Commission as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of
New Zealand.8,9
In accordance with the Clearfield Trust Doctrine, a
corporation does not have any implied right to govern a sovereign
people. We hereby register our vote of no confidence in the actions or
authority of the corporation unlawfully posing as a government in our
territory.
This unlawful Ardern government and its ministers
stand charged by the Nga Tikanga Māori Law Society and the Wakaminenga
Maori Government of Nu Tireni with genocide, war crimes, and crimes
against humanity related to their wilful disregard for the suffering and
loss of life resulting from their unlawful response to the engineered
bioweapon known as COVID-19 and the unlawful forced administration of a
poison to our people and forced medical experimentation.
Also charged with serious crimes related to a
pandemic response, the WHO and Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have no
standing or authority to form any binding agreement related to a
pandemic response, in any jurisdiction and we command that these
attempts shall cease and desist immediately pending the outcome of these
charges under Rome statutes 6, 7 and 8, filed in the international
Criminal Court 6 December 2021 ...
You are hereby directed to cease and desist
discussions or negotiations with the unlawful Arden Government, a NZ
Corporation, known as Her Majesty Queen in Right of New Zealand. The
Wakaminenga Maori Government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni reserves the right to
discuss/negotiate with any international partner(s) of its choice,
including the World Council for Health (WCH).”
Treaty Would Create Global Censorship of Health Information
The treaty would also give the WHO the power to censor health
information worldwide. On the European Council’s web page discussing the
pandemic treaty, under the headline “Restoring Trust in the
International Health System,” it states:10
“The agreement ... will set the foundation for better
communication and information to citizens. Misinformation threatens
public trust and risks undermining public health responses. To redeem
citizen trust, concrete measures should be foreseen to improve the flow
of reliable and accurate information as well as to tackle misinformation
globally.”
In other words, under this treaty, we can expect even greater
censorship than what we’ve experienced so far. Tech companies have
already proven where their allegiance lies, and it’s not with the
public.
Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others have deplatformed
just about everyone who posts health information that runs counter to
what the WHO is saying, real-world data and verifiable facts be damned.
Financial platforms have also banned people for the same reason. Now
imagine there being a binding international law that makes all that
censorship mandatory.
Their Playbook Was Revealed in 2019
Officially, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of the WHO, second only to the U.S. government,11 but the combined contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO as of 2018.12
Gates has also been funding pandemic exercises, including Event 201,13
held October 18, 2019, which gained notoriety for its extraordinary
accurate “predictions” of the COVID pandemic mere months before it was
declared. Other co-sponsors included the World Economic Forum and Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
However, earlier that year, February 14, 2019, Gates also funded the
Nuclear Threat Initiative’s (NTI) pandemic exercise for senior global
leaders on international response to deliberate biological events, which
took place in Munich, Germany.14,15
NTI was founded to assess and reduce threats associated with the proliferation of nuclear weapons,16 but they’ve since expanded to include biological threats.17 Gates has also given grants to the NTI for vaccine development in relation to biological threats.18
While Event 201 featured a fictional coronavirus outbreak, the NTI
exercise involved response to “deliberate, high consequence biological
events.” In other words, a deliberate release of a genetically
engineered bioweapon — in this case a pneumonic plague — for which there
is no available treatment. This exercise scenario was the first of its
kind. The video above features a summary of the four-phase exercise.
Curiously, in mid-November 2019, The Guardian, The New York Times,19 The Washington Post20 and others reported that two people in China had in fact been diagnosed with pneumonic plague.21
In addition to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the NTI event
was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust, the “philanthropic arm” of
GlaxoSmithKline and an investor in Vaccitech, which owns the patents to
AstraZeneca’s COVID jab.22 Both Gates and Wellcome are part of the technocratic globalist network that is pushing The Great Reset forward.
Another sponsor was Georgetown University,23
which also curated the World Economic Forum’s library of COVID-19
treatments (primarily focused on antivirals and COVID gene transfer
injections).24
Curation was done by three Georgetown University professors and
Rebecca Katz, director of the Georgetown Center for Global Health
Science and Security.25 Katz is also listed as an author on the NTI paper,26
“A Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding to a
Deliberate Biological Event,” published June 2019, in which they review
the conclusions reached from that February 2019 exercise.
‘A Spreading Plague’
Together, these two pandemic exercises — both of which were sponsored
by Gates — form a playbook for how to set up a biological attack and
then hide the truth from the world so that you can not only profit from
it in the short term but also centralize power, permanently transfer
wealth and change the social and financial order to your own liking in
the process.
Not surprisingly, a number of Event 201 participants also partook in the NTI’s exercise,27 and hold positions within technocratic institutions like Wellcome, the WHO and the World Economic Forum.
Event 201, in particular, focused not on finding remedies and saving
lives, but how to control “misinformation.” A vast majority of that
exercise centered around the creation of effective propaganda and
censorship. Similarly, “A Spreading Plague” also includes the
recommendation to enlist private companies as “assets” to carry out the
globalists bidding:28
“In 2019 and 2020, international organizations,
including the WHO, UNODA [United Nations Office for Disarmament
Affairs], and the World Economic Forum, should convene private sector
companies to identify gaps and concrete next steps to strengthen the
capability of companies to provide assets to assist with international
response for deliberate biological attacks and other high-consequence
biological events.”
In the NTI scenario — in which a fictional country called Carta is
found to have engineered and released a biological weapon into the
neighboring country of Vestia — we also see curious parallels to
current-day accusations by Russia, which claims biological weapons
research was being conducted in the Ukraine, necessitating defensive
action.
All in all, the NTI tabletop exercise only adds to the evidence pile
that suggests the COVID pandemic was premeditated and preplanned for
financial and geopolitical purposes. It was a power grab.
The pandemic treaty with the WHO is precisely what the World Economic
Forum and its allies now need, as it will put the technocratic cabal
firmly in charge of the biosecurity of the whole world, and empower them
to implement the rest of The Great Reset agenda.
You can learn more about The Great Reset on the World Economic Forum’s website29,30 and in Klaus Schwab’s book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset”31 (but you might want to review the overwhelmingly negative comments on Amazon first).
As noted in a July 21, 2020, World Economic Forum article,32
the economic devastation caused by COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns “has the
potential to hobble global prosperity for generations to come.” The
answer, according to the World Economic Forum, is for countries to make
sure the economic system is “built back better.”
Make no mistake, this catchy slogan is part and parcel of the Great
Reset plan and cannot be separated from it, no matter how altruistic it
may sound. Part of the “building back better” is to shift the financial
system over to an all-digital centrally controlled currency system that
is tied to a vaccine passport and/or digital identity system.
Together, they will form a pervasive system of social control, as
desired behaviors can be incentivized and undesired ones discouraged
through loss of various “privileges,” including access to your own
finances. Digital currency can even be programmed by the issuer so that
it can only be used for certain types of purchases or expenses.
While it’s going to be very difficult to stop this runaway train that
is The Great Reset, part of our defense is to oppose and prevent the
WHO’s pandemic treaty from becoming reality, as we’ll lose our national
sovereignty if it does.