The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) was created as an early warning system to identify
vaccines that may be triggering a higher than expected number of adverse
events. One of its primary objectives is to:1
“Provide a national safety monitoring system that
extends to the entire general population for response to public health
emergencies, such as a large-scale pandemic influenza vaccination
program.”
It’s far from perfect, but it’s still incredibly useful and does
serve its purpose. Publicly available VAERS data clearly reveal that the
COVID shots are the most dangerous “vaccine” ever created, accounting
for more injuries and deaths than all previous conventional vaccines
combined over the last three decades.
But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, which jointly run VAERS, continue to insist the
shots are “safe and effective,” and that not a single death has been
directly attributed to the shot.
Such claims are outlandish in light of the available data, and
perhaps they’re starting to realize the pickle they’re in as well,
because in recent months, investigators have discovered that VAERS
reports are being deleted in ever growing numbers. As noted by Stew
Peters of the Stew Peters Show (above):
“VAERS is supposed to simply collect reports filled
out by doctors and other medical professionals from around the country —
reports of people suffering injuries and illnesses and even death after
taking vaccines.
Nobody is supposed to be editing or curating or
fact-checking it. It’s supposed just be the reports of doctors for the
entire world to see. But now we have evidence that that’s, in fact, not
what’s happening at all.”
Who’s Deleting VAERS Reports?
Peters interviews Albert Benavides,
an RCM expert, data analyst and auditor, who’s been analyzing VAERS data
since the release of these novel shots.2,3
According to Benavides, at least 10,000 reports of death or serious
injury following COVID “vaccination” have vanished since the rollout of
the shots — and they were not duplicate reports, which is a common
“explanation” for their removal.
Benavides cites the case of a young child in Alaska who reportedly
died after the jab. That death report is now gone, and there’s no other
remaining report that matches it.
VAERS ID 18150964
is another example. This is the case of a 13-year-old girl in Maryland,
who died 16 days after her first jab. This report was entered October
25, 2021, and deleted April 15, 2022. VAERS claims it was deleted
because it was a duplicate, but there are no 13-year-old girls in
Maryland who died, anywhere else in VAERS.
According to Benavides, over the past 30 years, some 4,000 non-COVID
reports have been deleted, and of those only a couple of hundred were
deaths. For the COVID jab, VAERS is deleting a far higher proportion of
severe injuries and deaths. About 2% of all COVID jab-related reports
are deaths, and about 5% of death-related reports are being deleted.
The result of this is that the ratio of deaths to other injuries
appears lower than it probably is. Overwhelmingly, it’s reports of
severe injuries and death that are being deleted, which gives the
distinct appearance that they’re trying to hide the true extent of the
harm of these shots. Who could possibly be doing this? Benavides insists
the direction to delete valid reports must be coming from the very top
of the FDA and/or CDC.
If you want to dive deeper into Benavides’ data, you can find his VAERS Analysis Dashboard here. Another resource you’ll want to bookmark is the VAERS Wayback Machine on MedAlerts — a search system specifically for deleted VAERS reports.
Other Factors That Downplay COVID Jab Risks
Benavides also points out that only the initial VAERS reports are
available to the public. Updated reports are only viewable internally.
What that means is, we have no way of knowing how many of those who were
injured have since died from those injuries. This is a loophole that
can make a vaccine appear less risky than it actually is.
What’s more, Benavides is finding that they’re routinely
misclassifying the event level of severity; 65% of all COVID-related
reports have the lowest severity classification, meaning they’re not
serious and didn’t require medical intervention or hospitalization.
However, when you actually read the reports, you find heart attacks,
strokes, pulmonary embolisms and other clearly serious injuries. So,
many are clearly misclassified, or mis-coded. Benavides has also found
65 reports where the patient died after the COVID shot, but because the
box for death is not checked, they are not included in the total death
tally.
We also have evidence that VAERS is throttling the release of
reports. It can take months before a filed report is actually published,
as COVID jab victim Brittany Galvin has discovered.
In January 2022, she was eight months into the reporting process to
VAERS and was advised by VAERS staff that it would likely be another six
to 12 months before her case would be posted.5 In early June 2021, Peters interviewed her about her injuries and experience with the VAERS process (video below).6
VAERS Analysis Reveals Hundreds of Serious Side Effects
An earlier VAERS data analysis by Benavides, reported by Steve Kirsch in November 2021,7
revealed there were by then already hundreds of serious adverse events
associated with the COVID shot that were far more elevated than the
admitted risk of myocarditis, identified by the Department of Defense
(although that fact was for a time dismissed as “conspiracy theory”).
“The evidence in plain sight shows that they are either lying or incompetent. Or both,” Kirsch wrote.8 “In a ... VAERS data analysis performed by our friend Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88),
we found hundreds of serious adverse events that were completely missed
by the CDC that should have been mentioned in the informed consent
document that are given to patients.
And we found over 200 symptoms that occur at a higher
relative rate than myocarditis (relative to all previous vaccines over
the last 5 years). All together, there were over 4,000 VAERS adverse
event codes that were elevated by these vaccines by a factor of 10 or
more over baseline that the CDC should have warned people about ...
The FDA and CDC have basically been batting .000 in
terms of spotting safety signals that have been sitting in plain sight
the entire time ... The CDC has repeatedly said you can’t ascribe
causality to data in VAERS. Not true.
The VAERS data analysis (temporal data, the dose
dependency, and the elevated reporting rates compared to baseline)
provide ample signal to enable us to show causality on all of these
events using the five Bradford-Hill criteria applicable to vaccines.”
Of the hundreds of side effects Benavides identified, neurological,
cardiovascular and female reproductive problems topped the list. (You
can view and download the data from Kirsch’s article.9) Here are some selected highlights from Kirsch’s comprehensive review of Benavides’ findings:10
Pulmonary embolism, listed at No. 24, is 954 times higher than normal |
Increased fibrin D-dimer, No. 53 on the list, is
elevated by a factor of over 400 times above baseline. Charles Hoffe has
reported that D-dimer was elevated in over 60% of patients measured.11 As noted by Kirsch, “This is very serious as D-dimer is a lagging indicator of blood clots” |
Increased troponin, listed at No. 130, is 205 times
higher than normal. Elevated troponin is a biomarker for heart damage,
and in COVID jab victims, they are often elevated to extreme levels, up
to 10 times higher than that indicating heart attack, and can remain
elevated for months |
Brain herniation is elevated by a factor of 100 times above baseline |
Death is 96 times higher than normal |
Cardiac arrest is 93 times higher than normal |
Intracranial hemorrhage is 79 times higher than normal |
High Rates of Post-Jab Myocarditis Confirmed
Getting back to myocarditis (heart inflammation), which is the only
side effect the FDA and CDC have really admitted, a recent JAMA study
found that:12
“Both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were
associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. For
individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis
was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose.”
Among double-jabbed men (age 16-24), there were four to seven excess
myopericarditis events per 100,000 vaccinees in the first 28 days after
the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA shot, and anywhere from nine to 28
excess myopericarditis events per 100,000 after the second dose of
Moderna.
According to the authors, “The risk of myocarditis in this large
cohort study was highest in young men after the second SARS-CoV-2
vaccine dose” and “this risk should be balanced against the benefits of
protecting against severe COVID-19 disease.”
Rheumatologist Reports High Rate of Jab Injuries
While fact checkers are hard at work trying to debunk VAERS data as
too unreliable to pay any attention to, doctors and specialists around
the world — those brave enough to speak — are reporting absurdly high
rates of side effects among their COVID jabbed patients.
One of the latest ones is Dr. Robert Jackson, an award-winning
rheumatologist in Missouri. Kirsch recently interviewed Jackson (video
above),13
who reports that 40% of his COVID jabbed patients have been injured by
the shots; 5% remain unresolved, 5% have developed a new clotting
disorder and 12 have died. For comparison, he normally sees only one or
two deaths a year.
Of his 5,000 patients, about 3,000 got the shot. That means just over
1 in 300 were killed by the shot. Jackson’s clinical experience matches
nicely with data from other rheumatologists, published in the BMJ.14
They report a 37% adverse event rate among jabbed patients; 4.4% of
patients also had a flare up of their disease after the jab.
In the interview, Jackson also discusses some of the treatments he’s
using on these vaccine injured patients. Interestingly, he’s seen
significant improvement using a 30-minute infusion of mesenchymal stem
cell derived exosomes.
Non-COVID Excess Deaths Are Exploding
Across the world, and in most U.S. states, we are now seeing excess
deaths rates skyrocketing, and it’s not due to COVID. For U.S. data,
check out USmortality.com,15 where the excess mortality for each state is listed.
In California, the excess death rate rose from 13.5% in 2020 (38,799
excess deaths) to 18.7% in 2021 (52,278 excess deaths). And, less than
five months into 2022, California’s excess mortality has already
breached the 20% mark.
For the U.S. as a whole, there were 3,440,546 deaths of all ages for
the year 2020. The expected numbers were 3,028,959, so that was an
excess of 13.6% (411,587 above expected). In 2021, there were 3,459,496
deaths of all ages, which was 16.4% above expectations. As of mid-April
2022, the excess death rate was already at 14.1%, with 1,041,538
reported deaths of all ages. Among working age Americans, deaths are up
40%, compared to prepandemic levels.16
If the COVID jabs worked, you’d expect excess mortality to drop, yet
that’s not what we’re seeing. We’re also not seeing mass death from
COVID. The only clear factor that might account for these discrepancies
is mass injection with an experimental gene transfer technology.
Cyprus is also reporting elevated all-cause mortality for 2021 (16.5%, perfectly matching that of the U.S.).17
Third and fourth quarter rates are particularly elevated, which
corresponds with the rollout of booster shots. Canada, meanwhile, is
seeing a shocking 70% excess death rate for ages 0 to 44, compared to
2014 through 2019,18 and U.K. data show COVID-jabbed children, aged 10 to 14, are dying at 28 times the rate of their unvaccinated peers.19,20
I’ve provided other data examples in other articles, and they’re all
showing the same trend. The most tragic part of this is that it’s
intentional. None of the agencies charged with protecting public health
have lived up to their mandate. Instead, they’ve been serving the Great
Reset agenda.
Eventually, though, I believe the truth will simply be too
overwhelming and obvious to be ignored by the masses. FDA and CDC can’t
delete enough reports to make the jabs look safe. People’s personal
experiences also trump that of any data set, and now, vaccine injuries
are so commonplace, most people know of someone who had a bad reaction,
got COVID anyway or died from it. And they can’t scrub that.