The morning that hurricane Ian hit the
coast of southwest Florida, the dramatic images of the raw power of
Mother Nature blowing apart structures built by human hands and sweeping
them into the sea were unbelievable.1
After hours and hours of wind, rain and a catastrophic water surge that
left a trail of destruction in its wake, I thought about how very
different this natural disaster was compared to the one unleashed on the
world in 2020 that also left a trail of destruction in its wake.
Two disasters, one a natural disaster legally termed an “act of God,”
and the other a disaster that, three years later, people are still
asking: was it natural or manmade?2,3
Whether or not the SARS-CoV-2 virus spontaneously jumped out of a bat and into a human being4 or was created by scientists in a biohazard lab,5,6,7 one thing is clear: the chaotic response by the experts in charge has been a disaster in itself.8
And the people, whose lives were impacted by that chaos, experienced the same kind of sudden shock, fear,9
disorientation, isolation and powerlessness that many people, who
experience a hurricane, tsunami, tornado, earthquake or fire, feel when
the unexpected happens.
Pandemic Public Health Policies Generated Fear, Instability
In the middle of this hurricane, I found myself thinking about why fear of the unknown10 brought on by this emergency was so familiar.
It was familiar because we had just experienced fear of the unknown in the winter of 2020,11
when we were told by public health officials that a weirdly mutated
coronavirus was on the loose and would kill us if we didn’t hide in our
homes, wear cloth over our faces, cut off physical contact with our
family and friends, keep our children out of school, and stop getting
our hair cut or going to church, exercising in a gym, entering
restaurants or certain stores, and be OK with the government labeling
many workers and private businesses as “non-essential,” which shut down
our economy and threatened to plunge families into bankruptcy.12,13,14
The people in Florida facing this real life-threatening emergency
were suddenly having to call upon emotional and physical reserves
already depleted by having recently gone through another emergency, in
which some lost their health or their loved ones to the mutant virus, or
were injured by disabling COVID vaccine reactions, while others lost
their jobs, homes or businesses during the 2020 lockdown that,
thankfully, was cut short in Florida compared to many other states.
The fallout from destructive federal COVID response policies on the
mental health, child development and economic stability of our nation is
still being assessed.15,16,17,18,19,20,21
Two disasters: a natural one, and one that the world is still having
trouble defining. Post-hurricane Ian, there is a lot of analysis going
on in Florida by those, whose job it is to prepare for and respond to
hurricanes.22
By most accounts, it is an honest analysis by state officials working
hard to help people deal with what happened rather than politicizing
what happened.23,24,25
Keeping Us Living in Fear to Sell COVID Vaccine
Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended
the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until
January 11, 2023.26
To justify keeping us living in fear,27,28
federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a
more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an
especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick
this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at
the same time.29,30
One high ranking government doctor said with a straight face — “I
really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot
and the other one for the COVID shot.”31
But Americans have grown weary of virus porn and, while the majority
of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just
14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.32,33,34
There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number
of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and
government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to
get a COVID shot every single year.35,36,37,38
In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine
manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021
and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years
to come.39,40,41,42
A Mutated Virus, a Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine
Those two drug companies are selling a cell disrupter biological
product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other
vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a
weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that
has ever infected humans.
The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44
But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to
know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind
of damage it — or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA
product — are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53
The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects,
especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.54,55 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot,”56,57
even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all
conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported
online,58,59,60,61,62 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).64,65
There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to
VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain and immune
system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than
half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS
became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67
The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.
Reactions ‘Good’ Even When the Shot Doesn’t Prevent Infection
Yet, as soon as the mRNA COVID products were released in December
2020 under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), public health officials
told people to celebrate adverse reaction symptoms, trying to convince
them that those reaction symptoms means the vaccine is doing its job and
would prevent them from getting sick with COVID.68
Nothing could be further from the truth.69
That lie not only persuaded people to accept COVID vaccine reactions as
normal and a good thing, but it persuaded doctors to dismiss COVID
vaccine-related injuries and deaths as just a “coincidence.”70,71
Which brings us to perhaps the biggest elephant in the room, and that
is how blatantly the people were lied to from the beginning about just
how effective the mRNA COVID vaccines would be, as government officials
allowed people to believe that getting vaccinated would protect them
from being infected with the new coronavirus and transmitting it to
others, when that was never true.
In fact, it was so untrue that, in 2021, CDC officials changed the
centuries-old definition of a vaccine from a “product that stimulates a
person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a
preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against
diseases,” and they convinced Merriam Webster Dictionary to do the
same.72,73,74
That’s because the FDA only required drug companies to demonstrate
the COVID vaccine had at least 50 percent efficacy in preventing severe
symptoms of COVID disease, rather than preventing infection.75
There is a difference between a product producing immunity that
prevents infection and one that stimulates an immune response but does
not prevent infection, especially when you can be infected with the
coronavirus and not show symptoms.
With vaccine induced immunity off the table and vaccine adverse
reactions viewed as a good thing, by the end of October 2022, the global
mass vaccination campaign had convinced about 70 percent of the world’s
population to get at least one COVID shot.76
WHO Heading Up Global COVID Vaccine Marketing Campaign
The sales force for Big Pharma’s COVID vaccine marketing campaign is
headquartered at the United Nation’s World Health Organization,77,78,79
with de facto satellite offices in government agencies like the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gavi Alliance, the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, major universities, and
financial and other institutions ideologically and politically committed
to imposing “The Great Reset” on all countries.80
According to Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded an “international
organization for public-private cooperation” called the World Economic
Forum, the world is in the middle of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,”
which is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing
the physical, digital, and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines,
economies and industries and even challenging ideas about what it means
to be human.”81
In June 2020, Schwab proclaimed, “Now is the time for a great reset”
because, he said, in order for the world to effectively respond to the
COVID-19 pandemic, governments “must act swiftly to revamp all aspects
of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and
working conditions.”82
Event 201 Prepares for ‘The Great Reset’
To prepare the way for The Great Reset, on October 18, 2019, the
World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
and Johns Hopkins University sponsored a simulated global pandemic
planning exercise in New York City called Event 201.83
A “Pandemic Emergency Board” was assembled for Event 201 that
included representatives of the United Nations, World Bank, the U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the
China Centers for Disease Control, and leaders from the travel, banking,
pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.84
The virus selected for use in the simulated “worst case scenario”
global pandemic planning exercise held three months before the World
Health Organization declared a coronavirus “public health emergency of
international concern” was: the coronavirus.85,86
The nagging question is: was that just a coincidence? Clearly, it
will take a lot of coordination and agreement between all governments to
pull off a global Great Reset. Three years into the global COVID health
emergency, it appears the global public health elite are leading the
way.
Lancet Commission Publishes COVID ‘Lessons Learned’ Manifesto
In September 2022, the once respected medical journal, The Lancet,
published a 56-page report called “The Lancet Commission on lessons for
the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.”87
The first big red flag in the report is the long list of financial
conflicts of interest authors have with drug companies; government
health agencies; the United Nations and its public health agency arm,
the World Health Organization; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
Rockefeller Foundation and other institutions that fund or conduct
vaccine research and development and promote mandatory use of vaccines.
Once family owned, The Lancet is now owned by the publishing
conglomerate, Elsevier, and concerns have been raised about editorial
independence, in light of investor ties to major banking, pharmaceutical
and biotech corporations. One critique of the Lancet Commission report
was written by a public health physician, who previously called out the
journal in July 2022 for publishing what he described as “a
weakly-evidenced opinion advocating medical fascism.”88
That opinion, written by well-known compulsory vaccination
proponents, called for strict enforcement of COVID vaccine mandates in
the U.S., and loss of employment and school education for those who
refuse to comply.89
The Lancet Commission was originally assembled in the summer of 2020
as an international group of global “experts,” primarily doctors and
professors at prestigious universities, who were charged with addressing
the COVID pandemic. One of their first tasks was to investigate the
origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, an endeavor they quickly abandoned
because of what the authors described as “divisive public discussion”
and “unprecedented attack and pressure” on Commission members.
Leaving that inconvenient “where did the virus come from” question on
the table, the Lancet Commission went on to publish a self-aggrandizing
political manifesto that fails to honestly analyze what went wrong with
the global COVID pandemic response and, instead, basically calls for
doing more of the same more quickly in the future.
In a stunning demonstration of hubris and ideological bias,
Commission members stray from their areas of expertise and call on
governments to devalue individual rights and adopt a collectivist
orientation that forces individuals to comply with multi-lateral health
policies and laws adopted by the United Nations.
They said, “all governments, regulators and institutions must be
reoriented toward society as a whole rather than the interest of
individuals — a concept the Commissioners call prosociality.”
Attacking US Lawmakers, Critics of Pandemic Response Failures
This “prosociality” reorientation would, of course, require that much
more money and power be given to the United Nations and the World
Health Organization so global populations can be controlled by a central
authority, especially during global pandemic responses.
Defending their slogan “no one is safe until everyone is safe,” which
they claim “is not mere rhetoric, or a moral truth, but an
epidemiological reality,” they viciously attack U.S. lawmakers for being
guilty of “neglecting scientific evidence and needlessly risking lives
with a view to keeping the economy open,” and for promoting
“anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID 19.”
Refusing to acknowledge legitimate public concerns about
authoritarian COVID response policies that led to catastrophic social
and economic chaos and damage to mental and physical health of child and
adult populations, the Commission complains that the World Health
Organization and most governments did not move fast enough to test,
identify and isolate the infected while simultaneously putting all
people in masks and locking them in their homes — for a long, long time.
There is no critical analysis of faulty COVID tests that did not work;90,91 or bogus COVID death estimates that failed to distinguish between dying from COVID and dying with COVID;92,93,94,95,96
or ineffective COVID treatment protocols in hospitals that made people
sicker or killed them when they were inappropriately put on ventilators.97,98,99
While praising the “public-private partnerships” that fast tracked
development of COVID vaccines as a “triumph,” the Lancet Commission
weaponizes the failed COVID pandemic response by placing most of the
blame for COVID-related deaths on — you guessed it — those independent
thinkers the Pharma’s sales force calls “anti-vaxxers.”
Infuriated that a lot of people in the U.S. and Europe questioned the
competence of public health officials and defied their orders to mask
up, isolate for months on end and take the COVID shot, the Lancet
Commission authors alleged that anti-vaxxers — which according to
Webster’s Dictionary now includes anyone who opposes mandatory
vaccination100
— caused an “epidemic of misinformation and disinformation” that
fostered “low public trust” in government officials and persuaded
millions of people to repeatedly take to the streets in the United
Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark,
Sweden, Finland, Greece, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Bulgaria,
Serbia, Poland, Romania and other nations in 2020 and 2021 to protest
lockdowns and vaccine passports.101,102,103
Blaming Deaths on ‘Anti-Vaccine Movement,’ Individual Rights
They said “anti-vaccine propaganda in the Americas” caused “tens of
millions of people to refuse vaccines and hundreds of thousands to
needlessly lose their lives.”
Obsessing over the lack of “solidarity” among governments to force
everyone everywhere to march to the beat of the same drum, they express
special hatred for what they describe as the “hostile and coordinated
anti-vaccine movement that has spread dangerous and false information
about the health risks of vaccines and has campaigned against vaccine
mandates.”
Climbing up on very high horse, the Lancet Commission members put
“climate change deniers” and “parents who refuse or delay routine
childhood vaccinations” in the same basket. They repeatedly condemn
political leaders and the digital media for the “deliberate spread of
misinformation and disinformation … that fosters distrust in health
officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal
weight to the best available scientific evidence.”
They called for application of “behavioral science” to convince
people to engage in “prosociality” that leads to “optimal behaviors for
pandemic control,” pointing out that people living in societies with
“tight” or collectivist social norms follow public health orders much
better than people living in societies with “loose” or individualistic
social norms that champion freedom of individual choice.
They claim future pandemics would be so much easier to handle if
everyone in the world can be muzzled and locked down tight whenever
government health officials fly the utilitarian flag for “the greater
good” and demand we salute smartly and roll up our sleeves.
Their diatribe against societies allowing individuals to exercise
freedom of thought, speech, conscience and autonomy would be amusing if
they weren’t so deadly serious about what they want done about it.
Although there were some public demonstrations here in the U.S., they
were not as big as they were in countries without a Constitution that
ensures a balance of power between local, state and federal government.
Americans stopped COVID vaccine mandates in 2021 and 2022 because state
legislators, who make public health laws, looked at the science,
listened to concerns of their constituents, and refused to mandate the
vaccine.104
Although several U.S. Governors and city mayors issued Executive
Orders mandating COVID vaccine and the federal government attempted to
mandate the vaccine for all federal employees and contractors, not one
state legislature voted to mandate the vaccine this year.105
The online NVIC Advocacy Portal, launched in 2010 to help citizens in
every state defend vaccine informed consent rights and exemptions in
public health laws had a lot to do with holding back COVID vaccine
mandates and passports in the U.S. when populations in other countries
with centralized political control could not.106
Public Health Elite Wants US to Become a Collectivist Society
It doesn’t take a PhD in political science to figure out that what
the public health elite is calling for would require Americans to reject
the cultural values and beliefs and governmental structure outlined in
the US Constitution, which provides decentralized checks and balances on
political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights
that limit the power of government.107,108
The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability.
That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of
America “reorient” toward a collectivist society, which would require
disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal
government — in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course — has
the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think
about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their
children.
Accompanying the Lancet Commission report was a Lancet editorial
entitled “COVID-19: the case for prosociality.” And if you do a Google
search using the words “prosociality and communism,” what you find at
the top is an article published in Frontiers in Psychology in September
2022 entitled, “How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The
relationship between communist authority and prosociality.”109
The authors note how prosocial behavior is associated with religious
belief and argue that communist authority wielded by the ruling
Communist Party of China has a positive effect on promoting prosocial
behaviors in a secular atheist society. They say studies show that “the
psychological functions of gods and governments are interchangeable.”
Thank you, Lancet Commission, for making the political goals of the Public Health Empire so crystal clear.
Mandatory Vaccination: The Tip of the Spear in Culture Wars
I have been saying for many years that mandatory vaccination is the
tip of the spear in the culture wars taking place in this country and
others in the 21st Century. Because if the state can tag, track down and
force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of
known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which
individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater
good tomorrow.
Register today to use the NVIC Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org
and take action in your state to protect civil liberties in this
historic Vaccine Culture War that will determine whether we will live
free or die as slaves in a collectivist authoritarian state.
Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could
have done to change tomorrow. It’s your health, your family, your
choice. And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in
America.