Curious about the inner workings of the
World Economic Forum (WEF), the driving force behind The Great Reset?
Set aside 30 minutes to watch investigative journalist Whitney Webb
speak with MintPress News in the video above.1 Every year in January, WEF holds its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.
The 2023 theme was "cooperation in a fragmented world," with WEF
noting, "The world today is at a critical inflection point. The sheer
number of ongoing crises calls for bold collective action."2
Their actions, however, while carefully packaged to appear altruistic
— and steeped in warm-and-fuzzy buzzwords like "green" and
"sustainable" — will ultimately propel its small circle further into
power while all but guaranteeing a downtrodden populace. If you so much
as dip your finger beneath WEF's surface, it becomes clear that
corporatism and, more aptly, fascism, are its modus operandi.
WEF Promotes Fascist Ideology
WEF often speaks about the "transformative potential of public-private partnerships." According to WEF:3
"The private sector needs to speak the language of
social change, and the public sector needs to create economic incentives
to harness the private sector's innovation and expertise to address
society's challenges. With shared goals, targeted action and monitored
impact, we can move beyond dialogue and aspiration to the co-creation of
a more inclusive, prosperous and sustainable future."
It sounds good in theory. But what, exactly, is a public-private
partnership? It's when private entities like multinational corporations
join with the public sector, putting the two on equal ground. The
problem is that most politicians receive money and other favors from
these same multinational corporations, so many facets of the government
are essentially owned by these corporations.
In this way, Webb says, "It's really
more of a private-private partnership, and what you have there is
essentially a means of implementing specific policies being controlled,
more often than not, by the corporate sector and promoting what is
essentially a fusion of the private and public sector."4 Webb compares this ideology to that of Benito Mussolini, founder of Italy's National Fascist Party:5
"Mussolini … defined his particular brand of fascism
in the early and mid 20th century as corporatism emerging of private and
public power. Looking at it through that frame of reference essentially
the World Economic Forum … is promoting a fascistic ideology around the
world.
They have a habit of creating policies through both
the public-private partnerships that are housed within the World
Economic Forum and affiliated with but external to the World Economic
Forum.
Those policies are given then to governments around
the world, and many governments around the world have a lot of prominent
officials who in the past have been trained by the "leadership
programs" of the World Economic Forum and its affiliates."
A Closer Look at WEF's Board of Trustees
Many have heard of Klaus Schwab, WEF cofounder and chairman. But it's
also important to delve into WEF's Board of Trustees, which is packed
with powerful and prominent representatives from multinational
corporations. It includes:6
Kristalina Georgieva, head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) |
Al Gore, former vice president of the U.S |
Larry Fink, BlackRock CEO |
Marc Benioff, cofounder and CEO of Salesforce |
Mark Schneider, CEO of Nestlé |
One of the cofounders of the Carlyle Group, which has extensive intelligence connections |
"These are the people that are essentially driving this public
partnership model around the world, and they have very specific policy
agendas that, again, the WEF drafts — policy papers and white papers.
These are sent and then implemented by governments around the world,"
Webb says.7
This includes a strategic alliance WEF entered into with the United
Nations in 2019, which called for the UN to "use public-private
partnerships as the model for nearly all policies that it implements,
most specifically the implementation of the 17 sustainable development
goals, sometimes referred to as Agenda 2030."8
Agenda 2030 is composed of 17 sustainable development goals with 169
specific targets to be imposed across the globe. While "sustainable
development" sounds like a perfectly reasonable goal, this noble
sounding verbiage hides a hideous truth, as these plans are not what
they claim to be.
Agenda 2030
is aimed at reducing middle-class' consumption of basic goods and
energy, which includes limiting, with an eye toward eliminating,
property rights and private ownership for future generations, along with
targeting such "luxuries" as ownership of electric appliances and motor
vehicles along with suburban housing and air conditioning. Webb adds:9
"It's worth pointing out that in the late '90s at the
World Economic Forum annual meeting, the then-head of the UN, Kofi
Annan, essentially said that the World Economic Forum had been in part
responsible for what he referred to as a silent revolution at the UN,
where the UN, instead of championing the public sectors of the world,
which is how most people think of the UN, they would instead begin to
prioritize the needs of the businesses of the world …
So multinational corporations … over the past several
decades — the World Economic Forum being a major part of this — the
United Nations has been pushed to essentially prioritize corporate needs
over public needs."
Who Is Klaus Schwab?
Investigative journalist Johnny Vedmore has dug deeply into Schwab
and his family history, revealing that Schwab's father, Eugen Schwab,
ran the Ravensburg branch of a company called Escher Wyss during WWII,
producing "different components needed by the Nazi war machine … and the
Nazi atomic bomb program."10
Vedmore revealed three of Schwab's mentors — John K. Galbraith, a
Canadian-American economist, diplomat and public policy maker, Herman
Kahn, who created concepts on nuclear deterrence that became official
military policy, and Henry A. Kissinger, who recruited Schwab at a
Harvard international seminar, which was funded by the U.S. CIA.
"If you have a decent knowledge of Klaus Schwab's history, you will
know that he attended Harvard in the 1960s where he would meet
then-professor Henry A. Kissinger, a man with whom Schwab would form a
lifelong friendship," Vedmore explained. Further:11
"There were three extremely powerful and influential
men, Kissinger among them, who would lead Klaus Schwab towards their
ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned global domination via
the creation of social and economic policies.
In addition, two of the men were at the core of
manufacturing the ever-present threat of global thermonuclear war …
their paths would cross and coalesce during the 1960s … they recruited
Klaus Schwab through a CIA-funded program, and … they were the real
driving force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum."
Early WEF affiliations can also be tied back to the Club of Rome,
which aligned with neo-malthusianism — the idea that an overly large
population would decimate resources — and was intending to implement a
global depopulation agenda.
Transhumanism and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
No discussion of WEF would be complete without delving into
transhumanism, a term coined by Julian Huxley — brother of Aldous
Huxley, who wrote "Brave New World." Julian Huxley, however, was the
president of the British Eugenics Society and an ardent supporter of
eugenics ideology, Webb says.
A decade later, he wrote a book, "New Bottles for New Wine,"
explaining that advances in technology had led to a "new eugenics,"
which he referred to as the "merging of man and machine," or
transhumanism.12
"Ever since then," Webb says, "transhumanism has picked up steam. A
lot of its supporters were people that historically have had ties to the
eugenics movement. The Rockefeller Foundation is a really good example
of that."13 Schwab is another, who developed the term the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which brings in human-machine symbiosis.
One of Schwab's top advisers, transhumanist Yuval Noah Harari, Ph.D.,
openly admits data might enable globalists to do more than "just build
digital dictatorships." Via technology in the form of wearables and
implants — like brain chips — the idea is to one day surveil your very
thoughts.
"Humans are now hackable animals," Harari said. "Humans have this
soul or spirit and they have free will, and nobody knows what's
happening inside me, so whatever I choose, whether in the election or
whether in the supermarket, this is my free will — that's over."14 Webb explains:15
"Harari has made the point that the Fourth Industrial
Revolution is different from past industrial revolutions because … in
the late 19th century you had two classes — the exploited and the
unexploited. And he says, in contrast, now the Fourth Industrial
Revolution will mean there will be three classes — the unexploited, the
exploited and the irrelevant.
And he argues that it's much better to be exploited
than irrelevant. In this scenario, the unexploited would be the
oligarchs of society … he's essentially admitting that the Fourth
Industrial Revolution is a recipe for neo-feudalism, one that's managed
by extremely invasive, advanced technology."
Eventually, the goal is to make implantable devices capable of reading your thoughts as commonplace as cellphones are today:16
"Harari, at World Economic Forum meetings, says the
point that technology gets into your body and is capable of surveilling
your thoughts is the line that the world crosses into digital
dictatorship — where the leadership will be able to know what you really
think about them and what you really think about issues. And if you
don't agree — to use his words — you'll end up in the Gulag the next
morning."
Your Right to Dissent Is Threatened
The implications of mass surveillance policies being promoted by WEF
is an unconstitutional monitoring of dissent, with the intent of
stamping it out. Big Tech is working with military and intelligence
agencies toward this end, including using what's known as "predictive
policing" to detect "pre-crime."
This describes the use of AI algorithms that comb through data on
individual's internet activity to "profile you and decide if you ay
commit some sort of crime in the future." "If we invite surveillance
onto and into our bodies, we are crossing a red line into a tech-fueled
dystopia that … would result in a digital dictatorship that, once
implemented, will be almost impossible to escape from," Webb says.17
So, what can you do? "The most obvious way to stop it would be to not
comply or utilize these technologies that can be used to surveil you in
these ways," she explains. "A lot of this technology is marketed as
convenient," such as biometric data, but "the more of us that don't
comply, the less successful this agenda will be."18