This story is about the hubris of
conquest and genetic modification. Let's start with the ugly. The
richest people of the world, as well as their loyal servants from the
World Economic Forum, are on the Genetic Modification team. According to
the World Economic Forum, "the evolution of gene testing and gene editing will drive the future of healthcare."
They really can't sleep at night knowing that they have not yet stuck
their fingers into every nook and cranny of the human body and
efficiently monetized them! Here is a technical video from 2016 on
"Harnessing Gene Editing for Multiple and Permanent Genetic Changes."
I don't know ... somehow I am not excited. Besides, all of this sounds suspiciously like Manifest Destiny 2.0.
A Legal Framework for a "Mutant Apocalypse"?
In February 2022, Chile passed a law
prohibiting employers to discriminate against genetically impaired
employees. The bill was "initiated on a motion by the Honorable Senator
Mr. Alejandro Navarro Brain." In response, a lot of people in the
freedom community started asking questions. Does somebody expect a great
increase in the number of genetically impaired people? Why? Here is the
law (translated):
"Article 1. — No employer may condition the hiring of
workers, their permanence or the renewal of their contract, or the
promotion or mobility in their employment, to the absence of mutations
or alterations in their genome that cause a predisposition or a high
risk of a pathology that may manifest itself during the course of the
employment relationship, nor require for such purposes any certificate
or examination that allows verifying that the worker does not have
mutations or alterations of genetic material in his human genome that
may lead to the development or manifest in a disease or physical or
mental abnormality in the future."
"Article 2. — The
worker may express his free and informed consent to undergo a genetic
test, in accordance with the provisions of article 14 of Law No. 20,584,
as long as it is aimed at ensuring that he meets the physical or mental
conditions necessary and suitable to carry out work or tasks classified
as dangerous, with the sole purpose of protecting their life or
physical or mental integrity, as well as the life or physical or mental
health of other workers.
If these exams are required by the employer, the
latter must assume the cost of it. Likewise, if there is a current
employment relationship, the time used to carry out said exams will be
understood as worked for all legal purposes."
"Article 3. — Health establishments and laboratories
that carry out this type of examination, as well as employers who access
this information, must adopt all the security measures prescribed in
Law No. 20,584 and in Article 12 of Law No. 20,120, in order to protect
the privacy of the worker and guarantee confidential handling of the
data. The worker will always have the right to access the information
revealed by a genetic test."
The law was published
in the official gazette on February 16, 2022. The jury on why this law
had to pass is still out. For background on the GMO industry in Chile,
here is a "GMO-positive" analysis from 2016.
What Could Potentially Cause an Excessive Amount of Genetic Impairment?
We, human beings of the 21st century, are bombarded with poisons
every step of the way — and we are kind of on our own with this. Our air
is polluted. Our water is filled with contaminants (speaking of, as a
tangent, the water coming out of my tap in New York City is a little
rusty ... go figure). Our food, unless we are super vigilant and can
afford organic (and even then) contains God knows what. Glyphosate is
everywhere, and so are "forever chemicals."
Plus, on a daily basis, we deal with emotional stress, geoengineering-derived toxicity (about geoengineering, here and here),
electromagnetic pollution ... seriously, it's a miracle that we are
still around, given that our wealthy are treating us like roaches!
And now, we have a new ambitious player in the area of messing with
our bodies! Meet the biological bandit, the novel injections! As we all
know, the COVID injections are designed to turn our bodies into
factories producing spike proteins (in the words of the CDC, "harmless pieces").
At no point in known history have our bodies been asked to grow
foreign spikes on the surface of our cells — so this is frankly kind of
creepy. There is a reason why our instincts naturally go against
Frankenstein initiatives and untested products. It's because they are
Frankenstein and untested!
Case in point: were those products maybe tested for important things like genotoxicity? Let's ask the trustworthy insert for the trustworthy FDA-approved product, Comirnaty. It says the following:
"COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility." Oh. But at least, it is not really genetic modification because it doesn't change our actual DNA, right?
Not so Fast?
First of all, let me point out that the scientists are still discovering new connections and even organs in the human body (here, here, and here),
so any knowledge they have is conditional, and real scientists are
humble and cautious. The arrogant ones may puff their cheeks all day —
but it doesn't mean that they really know how thing work, in a finite
manner.
So, in the case of eliminating the possibility of DNA damage, even if
the regulators were pure and honest, and if they were truly following
the also pure and honest scientists, their statement about the novel
product not impacting human DNA is only a "good faith" opinion, as of
this second. After all, the product is novel!
Lo and behold, here is dr. Paul Alexander's analysis of the study called, "Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line."
Quoting the abstract: "Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine
BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic
effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a
recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and
integrated into the genome of human cells."
As Dr. Alexander notes poignantly, "the failure is that the vaccine
companies did not study this in clinical trial. We have no idea in the
human model as we have no idea in everything as to the safety of these
vaccines and the short, medium, and long-term effects. We have no idea
if persons who have taken these vaccines will not have autoimmune
disease or be severely ill, or have severe side effects, or even die
from the vaccines, in the future."
And here is analysis by Mikolaj Raszek, PhD, in Canada. Dr. Raszek looked at the Australian Pfizer data, i.e. "Nonclinical Evaluation Report for BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATYTM)," submitted in January 2021.
To sum up my answer to the question as to whether COVID injection may
alter human DNA, we have no idea. And yet so many people are forced to
take them — like cattle (which is not to say that it is right to treat
cattle in this manner, it is also wrong).
The Question of Ownership
Many of us remember how Monsanto sued different farmers
after Monsanto's toxic products contaminated the farmers' crops. The
corporate giant claimed that the farmers had illegally used their
patented products. (I'd say, this is emotional and intellectual abuse,
who even wants their products).
Which brings us to today — and the legal analysis by the disabled rights attorney Todd Callender
who has looked at a U.S. Supreme Court case from 2013, and it led him
to believe that this case could have far-fetching legal implications for
the recipients COVID injections.
The case in question is "ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY ET AL. v. MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL." Here is the exact syllabus of the case, as per Cornell Law School website:
"Each human gene is encoded as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which
takes the shape of a "double helix." Each "cross-bar" in that helix
consists of two chemically joined nucleotides. Sequences of DNA
nucleotides contain the information necessary to create strings of amino
acids used to build proteins in the body. The nucleotides that code for
amino acids are "exons," and those that do not are "introns."
Scientists can extract DNA from cells to isolate specific segments
for study. They can also synthetically create exons-only strands of
nucleotides known as composite DNA (cDNA). cDNA contains only the exons
that occur in DNA, omitting the intervening introns."
"Respondent Myriad Genetics, Inc. (Myriad), obtained several patents
after discovering the precise location and sequence of the BRCA1 and
BRCA2 genes, mutations of which can dramatically increase the risk of
breast and ovarian cancer.
This knowledge allowed Myriad to determine the genes' typical
nucleotide sequence, which, in turn, enabled it to develop medical tests
useful for detecting mutations in these genes in a particular patient
to assess the patient's cancer risk. If valid, Myriad's patents would
give it the exclusive right to isolate an individual's BRCA1 and BRCA2
genes, and would give Myriad the exclusive right to synthetically create
BRCA cDNA.
Petitioners filed suit, seeking a declaration that Myriad's patents are invalid under 35 U. S. C. §101.
As relevant here, the District Court granted summary judgment to
petitioners, concluding that Myriad's claims were invalid because they
covered products of nature. The Federal Circuit initially reversed, but
on remand in light of Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus
Laboratories, Inc., 566 U. S. ___, the Circuit found both isolated DNA
and cDNA patent eligible."
"Held: A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of
nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but
cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring."
According to Todd Callender,
who was interviewed by Corona Investigative Committee, the document
holds that the use of mRNA for modification of the genome results in a
synthetic genome that belongs to the patent holder. Therefore, if we
follow that line of legal logic, it is possible to conclude that using
mRNA to modify human cells can result in said cells (and living beings)
owned by the patent holder.
As of this moment, there is still no clarity and no official legal
conclusion as to whether this interpretation will apply — but given how
crazy the past two years have been, and how brazenly the bulldozer has
been proceeding so far, nothing seems off limits. Also this:
>>>>> Click here <<<<<
And we are at it, let's also look at the concept of "DNA storage."
>>>>> Click here <<<<<
The War on Everything Natural
All this fits in perfectly with the "blue ocean" business model that creates new markets out of thin air.
I wrote about this in detail in a 2021 article about the war on natural immunity and ability
— but the gist is that eroding natural health and natural defenses
(whether accidentally or on purpose) turns us into loyal customers who
have to subscribe to the "artificial immunity" service for the rest of
our lives, however long it lasts. Sucks for us but very good for
business!
And where does the money come from, assuming that the citizens are
all half-alive and can barely provide for themselves? Well, the money
could come, for example, from the virtual digital "press" owned by the
central bank, who would fund the "noble" companies providing the
artificial immunity services to the people in the name of "public
health" ... You know the drill.
It's all for our own good! In this case, the citizens would exist as
mere excuses for the companies to make money. Which, to be fair, has
been the case for a while, just in a way that was hidden from many of us
— until two years ago.
The end result would look very much like the Monsanto arrangement
where living forms are modified to depend on purchased products, while
remaining in an increasingly toxic environment. I don't know about you,
but I already feel bad for the crippled GMO tomato, and I certainly
don't want to turn into something similar.
The Fear of Missing Out
Let's look at the existential picture. Where does all this cluelessness, arrogance, greed, and cruelty come from?
Human beings do a lot of unintelligent and self-destructive things
out of fear (I've done it, I am no exception, definitely no finger
pointing here). Fear of missing out (and thus being humbled by rivals)
is important motive in our culture.
I think that, philosophically speaking, today's unhealthy hunger for
conquering nature and scanning every nook and cranny for "goodies" — and
then squeezing every drop of juice out everything, and then tossing it
out — is driven by a spiritual void, by the lack of joyful faith, by the
fear of being existentially vulnerable, intellectually unsophisticated,
and emotionally unimportant.
After all, even the most egregious greed covers up for a spiritual
void since we don't really need to own everything in the world to be
happy. It's like, "If I leave even a drop of valuable goods on the side
of the road for someone else to grab them, I'll feel so stupid! And they
will sure judge me! And I am afraid of that so I'd rather just take
it."
Right now, we are living in times of very ripe and internalized fear
and peer pressure but initially, to shake the people off their axis, it
had to come with violence, which is something that all of our ancestors
experienced at different points.
Here is a non-GMO-related story that really moved me several years
ago, and stuck with me. It was told by the Dagara elder Malidoma Some,
who, sadly, passed away last year (and I just learned about it, so I am
very shocked and sad).
As a young child, Malidoma Some was kidnapped by priests into a
mission boarding school, which he fled as a teen, and then had to
undergo a lot of things in order to heal. He then moved to America and
dedicated his life to help westerners understand the centuries-tested
wisdom of his people.
One of his stories stuck in my mind. He wrote about how the
missionaries who came to his village tempted the farmers. The
missionaries promised to buy the crops from the farmers if the farmers
bought the fancy fertilizes from the missionaries. Some of the farmers
got tempted and bought the fertilizes.
The missionaries' fertilizers "made the land angry," and the crops
didn't grow. And so those farmers found themselves in debt to the
Jesuits for the fertilizers, and without the yields. And from being
indebted, they were more vulnerable to the demands of the missionaries.
This sounds very similar to the behavior of Monsanto, leading to
farmer suicides in countries like India (a fact so egregious that the
establishment had to "debunk" it).
Similar things were unfortunately done in the Americas, too, as a
part of the intentional policy of building outposts around Indian
territory to seduce and corrupt the people on the "reservations" (what a
word, if you really think about it). The well-documented
strategy was designed to steal more land from the Native people — who
were already greatly perturbed by the violence of the "great reset" that
had been handed to them by the Europeans.
The plan was to sell them goods "on credit," and put them in so much
debt that they would let go of more their land. The final goal was for
the Native people to "own nothing and be happy" (yes, the original American great reset, and we really need to come to terms with how similar it is to the great reset of today, which is still in early stages.
Conclusion
I believe with great passion that in order for us to win this victory
and to stop the bulldozer, we need to tackle the underlying spiritual
and spiritual malaise, or else the bulldozer will keep coming at us in
different ways. Being spiritually honest and brave, and working toward
healing after centuries of abuse, are the challenges of our generation,
and perhaps of many generations to come.
Bottom line, we are free people. We never belonged to the great
resetters, just like the people who came before us never belonged to the
great resetters of their time.
And there is no need to scan every nook and cranny of bodies, looking
for money. Unmonetized bodies are free bodies. So I pray that we the
people start pedaling toward honesty and wisdom so that we can heal.
About the Author
To find more of Tessa Lena's work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.